2006-11-23 17:07:32 · 23 answers · asked by tdude09 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Creationism. Although largely faith based there is also substantial evidence for creation....
....as well as hardly any evidence for evolution....
2006-11-23 17:32:02 · answer #1 · answered by Harrison S 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Both.
While it is concievable that the universe has always existed too much scientific evidence points to there having been a begining time to the universe several Billion years ago.
Evolution on the other hand is involved with what happened after the creation of the universe. I do not put human constraints on what the creater of the universe can do. I do believe that he tells us the truth and that he would not put things in the earth to try to fool us about what was done in the past. The fosil records show that the world was significantly different just a few hundred million years ago.
2006-11-23 17:23:21 · answer #2 · answered by anonimous 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I believe evolution is the only plausible explanation for life on earth.
Where the universe came from in the first place is clearly not explained by evolution, and it is only partially explained by the more relevant scientific theories. Personally, I don't think that the explanation of a creator is helpful either, but the reality is that we will never know for sure, so I respect those who believe that a god or gods brought the universe into being about 10-15 billion years ago.
2006-11-23 17:37:09 · answer #3 · answered by Tim N 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i've got self assurance in creation. a minimum of a few of it. to place it purely, there is surely no evidence that evolution works or ever existed or exists, and that i recognize they say it would take hundreds of thousands and billions of years yet than how the hell did guy stay to tell the story. Why did no longer each and every thing evolve as a replace of purely guy, why are not the animals changing and we ought to consistently surely be seeing variations, transformations in animals. there is not any evidence for evolution and a great deal of what's in the Bible has been shown, and as you mentioned, there could no longer be the different logical concept so i'm prepared to take a guess that what hasn't been shown in the Bible, the way creation became made, is surely real in view that alot of different stuff in it rather is been shown real and there is not any real sturdy evidence for evolution and not something is evolving.
2016-10-17 11:26:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in Creation. I know of biological evolution from the abundant scientific evidence. One does not conflict with the other. Creation deals with origins. Evolution deals with ongoing change in already existing organisms.
2006-11-23 17:53:51 · answer #5 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definatly Creation!!
2006-11-23 17:15:04 · answer #6 · answered by jessi n 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe in Creation.
2006-11-24 12:22:49 · answer #7 · answered by Hadassah R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in both. Who would anything or anyone evolve from if they weren't first "created"? You are baiting those who have a true religious belief that God created "man", as opposed to those who believe "man" evolved from a lower form of life. What difference does it make? I'm here, my children and grandchildren are here, and we're doing the best we can!
2006-11-23 17:37:00 · answer #8 · answered by Baby Poots 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
youre discussing a topic that has been debated for as long as man has been able to think. I personally believe in evolution, but to ask this question is like asking peoples favorite color, its dumb.
2006-11-23 18:11:04 · answer #9 · answered by UMkvec 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Proponents of each would have you believe evolution and creation are different, but the truth is that they are the same. Read Zacharias Sitchin. You can dl his e-books on soulseek.
2006-11-23 17:16:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋