English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It seems to me that what we need is decent candidates that understand the middle of the road. Haven't we seen enough of the liberal and conservative agendas? I cringe when I hear politicos speak about "hearing from God." I am equally distrusting of those who want to remove "God" from public places. These are extreme examples, but I think you get the point. Surely we can find people who understand that the devil is in the details...(figuratively speaking). It seems America votes for one extreme for a decade, then things fall apart. Then the pendelum swings wide the other way and we stick with that until our world crumbles again. In the meantime, members of the minority party grumble with discontent - blaming all that is bad on the opposition.
How interesting it would be to have a Republican president and a Democratic VP, or visa-versa. Would it ever work? Dare we consider such a thing?
My question is this: How do we seek and elect these reasonable thinkers who see both sides?

2006-11-23 16:06:18 · 8 answers · asked by Timothy Lee 1 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Ok let me say this first, I am a far left liberal democrat.

With that said, I have recognized recently the country's dire need to meet in the middle. The public is crying out of this. They seem to be screaming, "Stop the fighting, bantering."

So, I have vowed to surrender some of my far left views and accept a centrist candidate. I will gladly do this because I feel it is best for the country in many ways.
1. It will start the healing.
2. It will stop this crazy division.
3. It really is the best for the country in the long run.
4. It is the only way to get anything fixed or accomplished.

2006-11-23 16:17:44 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

In reality, I think very few of our elected leaders sit on the far right or far left. Sure there are some, and because of this, they get a lot of the attention, which then makes it seem like all of the politicians are like this. I used to have a job that allowed me to meet with members of the House and Senators, and by and large, either dem or rep, they were all just normal folks trying to do the best job they could. TV ratings drives this idea of far-left v. far-right, red v. blue. But if you look at detailed maps, you'll see we're not that divided, the map is very purple (literal and figurative). I don't think you'd ever get a Republican as Prez and Democrat as VP, or vice versa, but I have often hoped that an elected President would officially become an Independent and then really run for reelection on his or her record, rather than a smear campaign.

But people like labels. Bush is labeled a far-right extremist, but as a conservative, I see a very moderate president.

2006-11-23 17:18:39 · answer #2 · answered by theodore r 3 · 0 0

for my area, the biggest substitute got here from the Republicans. Democrats have traditionally been a coalition occasion, so the certainty that there are Socialists interior it (Democratic Socialists are area of the Democratic occasion's inventive Caucus. For the checklist: they have just about little say in surely coverage) and different left, left wing human beings isn't various a transformation. The Republicans, on the different hand, equipped a coalition of the non secular good and economic Conservatives. The non secular good had somewhat some say in the occasion for a jointly as, incredibly throughout the time of the Bush 2 years, and what we are seeing (lower back, for my area) are the economic conservatives attempting to take back the occasion. so which you're good that they are revamping their image in view that they're determining to purchase and merchandising out one Conservative philosophy for yet another. regardless of if this is a flow extra to the astonishing or no longer is an argument of opinion. That being mentioned, i'll additionally say that, as a liberal, it sounds like somewhat some liberal concepts are being sacrificed to play ball with Republicans, who've toughened up and refuse to concede any of their factors in return.

2016-10-17 11:22:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Every presidential election year comes and the candidates both seem to be fairly moderate in their political stance. Then a few months later, they're spewing all sorts of garbage. And you think, who is this guy? Clinton didn't stray too far from the middle, but for both elections, Bush didn't seem so bad. Boy, I must be a bad judge of character!

I think the closest we'll come to having a Republican president and Democrat VP is having a candidate who switched parties in his lifetime and appears to be moderate.

2006-11-23 16:10:06 · answer #4 · answered by J G 4 · 0 0

If our current administration had been any more moderate, it would have been left, and remember, Congress has more practical power than the VP.

The failure of our current congress to accomplish much has to do with all the varying within the Republican party.

In fact, something I don't see talked about much around here is that some of the Republican incumbents who just got defeated were more liberal than the dems who replaced them.

2006-11-23 16:19:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

i liked that website
i was just visiting a kindergarten classroom where the pledge of allegiance was said and tears came to my eyes
liberal America wants to destroy this tradition

but your question
when America was formed, the winner of the election would become president and the loser was vice president
consequently, this did not work, so it has been reformed to what we have now

2006-11-23 16:22:14 · answer #6 · answered by rightwing 2 · 0 0

Moderates can't make up their minds.

2006-11-23 17:28:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I TOTALLY AGREE.

2006-11-23 16:25:51 · answer #8 · answered by bradship4u 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers