To consider: gays can't breed (yet).
Why didn't Bush speak out against terrorist marraige, is he for terrorist marraige? Or does he just like making the terrorists happy. I say terrorist marraige emboldens our enemies. Shame on you President George W Bush for supporting Terrorist Marraige.
Paid for by the Lies to Distract You Foundation
2006-11-23 14:32:02 · 20 answers · asked by Tofu Jesus 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Terrorist Marriage..... it sounds like Ann Coulter tying the knot with Dick Cheney.
Good point... except it will convince no one. Fair-minded people already agree, and the neocons wouldn't accept it even if the real Jesus handed them written orders to do so.
2006-11-23 15:11:00 · answer #1 · answered by KALEL 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL@ gays can't breed "yet"????
???
tofu, do you really think the complicated female sexual organs needed would find a home in a man's body and actually work?
And I can't wait to see the day when a lesbian can produce sperm on her own.
LOL. Let's remember the way life works and the biology course about sperm and egg.
Sure, and won't it be fun for gays to open a whole new ethically controversial can of worms with making clones of themselves,
and if they ARE born like that, wouldn't that mean they WOULD be reproducing gays?
hmmm...
I'd almost want them to clone themselves so it can be proven conclusively whether life experiences and environment and choices really did take a role in their sexual preferences.
2006-11-23 14:34:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since when is being a terrorist in the genes? I would say gay marriage.
2006-11-23 14:37:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No clue wut terrorist marriage is, but there's nothign wrong with gay marriage. So they can't breed, you know there's billions of children in those adoption centres? While there are people out there having kids and throwing them out, the gay couples could adopt them! So the kids would have a chance to understand what a family is before they get married
2006-11-23 14:36:06 · answer #4 · answered by Voltage 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And it's because gays can't breed that they often refer to us hets as "breeders". ...Amongst other things.
Gay marriage or terrorist marriage, huh?
I think George is more upset with gay marriage than terrorist marriage... and that's only because he gets to kill terrorists. Well, take a crack at it, anyway! Gays? Well, who would believe that gays have weapons of mass destruction?
You know, come to think of it...
2006-11-23 14:44:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What about gay terrorist marriage ?
2006-11-23 14:38:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not so fast. What about Bush's lack of support for gay suicide bombers? Sure, he'll decry terrorist suicide bombers all day long, but why give tacit approval for non-terrorist gays to blow themselves up in markets and buses?
2006-11-23 14:37:41 · answer #7 · answered by WJ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If gay muslims get married will they explode when they try to have sex? Allah BOOMbar
PS, since allah was a pagan moon god, does that make all terrorists gay?
2006-11-23 14:43:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what you mean by terrorist marriage unless you are referring to the way our troops are penalized for choosing to marry an Iraqi.
2006-11-23 14:35:16 · answer #9 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gay terrorists marriage?!!!!!!!
2006-11-23 14:37:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋