English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-23 08:48:51 · 10 answers · asked by cirque de lune 6 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

10 answers

gimme a "D"...gimme a "U"...gimme an "H"...

2006-11-23 08:54:48 · answer #1 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 4 0

OJ is a man who was thoroughly investigated, was tried in a court of law that was presided over by a fair judge and had the evidence evaluated by a jury who found him innocent of murder. He has always maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand.
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times a publisher controlls the general content and even the title of a book which an author must agree to if he needs the contract.

2006-11-25 09:12:19 · answer #2 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0 3

Yes

2006-11-23 17:03:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

two lovely young people are dead. He is a sociopath and wants to be in the limelight all the time. I chose to leave justice in God's hands and not mention this man. He should be shunned. Doni

2006-11-23 16:52:46 · answer #4 · answered by doni 1 · 2 1

Yes and thank God Fox decided not to air his program.

2006-11-23 16:53:19 · answer #5 · answered by PrimeTime 2 · 2 0

Do leaves grow on trees! Of course!

2006-11-23 16:53:45 · answer #6 · answered by Dominique(G-9) 3 · 3 0

100% yes I do, and he got away with it too.

2006-11-23 16:51:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

yeah i do hes guilty, he may not have killed her but he had something to do with it

2006-11-23 18:51:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes.

2006-11-23 16:51:42 · answer #9 · answered by T-MAC 2 · 3 0

YEP.

2006-11-24 00:49:52 · answer #10 · answered by cola 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers