2006-11-23 07:52:36 · 17 answers · asked by Spartan L 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Most english speaking people have no idea honestly. We don't care about people in Africa unless they're the cute dying kids on t.v. Sad, but true.
2006-11-23 07:55:10 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mess Mugabe has got that poor country in I imagine any body called Smith would do a better job than that tyrannical madman. From the bread basket of Africa to the dung heap of Mugabe`s ego.
Shame they had no oil, our beloved leaders might have lifted a finger to help the poor sods. The War on terror it would seem only applies to oil rich country's or places were the world production of opium is centered
2006-11-23 23:10:37 · answer #2 · answered by Jim G 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both of these men are in their mid 80's and beyond their sell by date.
Had things been different years ago Smith would have developed further Rhodesia and as it was then, it would now be the wealthiest country in Africa.
Rhodesia would have got Independence but Smith could not wait so his action of UDI was the beginning of what we see today.
The truth is between them Mugabe & Smith destroyed Rhodesia and created Zimbabawe and must accept that legacy.
The worst thing would be for the USA, UK or EU get involved.
2006-11-23 20:06:16 · answer #3 · answered by ian d 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nicely, Smith being lifeless and all, i might say Mugabe, because of the fact all of us's greater effective than a lifeless guy. precise now, David Icke may be a greater effective wager than Mugabe. Neither of them have lots grip on fact yet Icke's planet is slightly closer to Earth than Mugabe's. as nicely, Morgan Tsvangarai is a greater effective wager than the two of them.
2016-12-10 14:29:30 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mugabe is going the wrong way about reclaiming the land. He is stealing from the whites. However, He is not much different from Smith and his cohorts who stole the land in the first place.
2006-11-23 09:16:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mugabe is just as bad as Saddam Hussein, but guess what? USA and UK won't do anything to stop him because they haven't got lots of oil in Zimbabwe
2006-11-24 01:16:16 · answer #6 · answered by button mushroom 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
neither of them were and are fit to run that country. both smith and mugabe messed it up because of the way they treated their own people
2006-11-23 23:50:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anybody but Mugabe, the current day Black Hitler
2006-11-23 08:34:23 · answer #8 · answered by Billyhr2 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
none of these idiots - the leaders of any country should be large group of elected people - like a cabinet. Tony Blair and Bush for example are not democratic leaders as they have too much power
2006-11-23 08:10:57 · answer #9 · answered by mark_gg_daniels 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no doubt Mr Ian Smith.
2006-11-23 09:47:47 · answer #10 · answered by tom t 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋