Diversity is good, but never mind, think about it practically.
In order to do that, you would probably have to ban any inter-racial relationships within your country, which would lead to all sorts of problems, so you may well have to ban other races from living in your country at all.
What would you achieve?
Inbred, un worldly narrow minded people
There are better ways of celebrating your culture than 'protecting your bloodlines'.
2006-11-23 05:59:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by HP 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Would that not be stereotype?
Definition:A conventional, formulaic, and oversimplified conception, opinion, or image
or another one I found:
Stereotype production is based on:
Simplification
Exaggeration or distortion
Generalization
Presentation of cultural attributes as being 'natural'.Unshakeable belief in stability of stereotype Racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination Historical factors.
Myself being mixed and having a child who is even more mixed, I can only say: A race which stays to themselves will not evolve much.
My child and others like her are different, more profound than others.
They are very versatile, have a high sense of justice and are sympathetic to all people, no matter of race or gender.
If we all stayed for ourselves we would not be in the internet together.
There would be no im/export of good and ideas. No one would come to your aid in case of great need.
And even if we would all stay for ourselves, it would still not be enough for men. At the end that would start fighting amongst themselves.
We have to keep an eye on them for their own good.
2006-11-23 06:44:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by eidunotno 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
How did the different races evolve to begin with? Well, different groups of Homo erectus wandered out of Africa and settled in different new places. The different environments caused the dispersed groups to develop different adaptations, and race is the result of that divergent evolution. So far, this is a natural process. Nature seems always to strive to develop diversity, but what usually happens after the diversification is made, is ruthless competition for mastery. The best of the diverse groups ends up killing off and replacing its competitors within its native habitat.
What isn't natural is race-mixing, which leads to genetic recombination and to the blending away of racial differentiation. Nature does not work by blending differences away; it works by creating them, and then setting them at each other in violent struggles, to see which set of hereditary qualities is the best. Race-mixing blunts all edges, ruins all fine adaptations, and removes options from existence before they can be tested for their merits.
In other words, race-mixing is an adaptive strategy for inferior races, for races who see nothing but doom in the process of natural selection and who wish to blend themselves with a superior race so that their own genes can "hide" among better ones.
In prehistoric times, our own ancestor, Homo habilis, killed off the other major race of hominid, Australopithecus robustus. If our ancestor had chosen not to fight, then robustus would have wiped him out and his descendants would be here today, instead of us. And likewise when Cro-Magnon wiped out Neanderthal.
This is a story that has repeated itself millions of times, and not just with hominids, but will all species, everywhere on Earth, since life began. Whenever two kinds of living creature try to occupy the same environmental niche, they are natural competitors for limited resources. They will fight, because they must - it's the only chance either of them has to survive - and the winner takes all: the loser becomes extinct.
The morality of the violence of natural selection is beyond our power to decide. It IS how things are, whether we like it or not. We did not design the universe, and we did not choose the laws of nature. But we will obey them, or we will die at the hands of those who obey them better than we do.
2006-11-23 12:02:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hello I'm sure there is one way and that would be to herd everyone up and put them in a concentration type enviorment. Listen here we all are going to have some type of racisim in us. There isn't no one on this planet thats not racisit in some aspect.
Remember that we are all animals and its that we are the most advanced of the animals, animals do go into heat.
2006-11-23 21:38:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by wrichard1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope.
It is officially evil to like your own race better than anyone. Do you hear me? That makes you bad.
And don't even think of liking your own race better than *everyone.* You will go to hell when you die.
You have to like all races, even if you don't. Indians are not allowed to want more of themselves in the world. That is racist. You are not allowed to want more of yourself in the world. That is racist. No one is allowed to want less of anyone in the world. This is VERY racist.
So, in conclusion, any act of protecting any one race is racist.
2006-11-23 09:26:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by litestim 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, all you have to do is marry inside your race and have babies inside your race. You don't have to go out preaching and talking about it. In my opinion that'd be doing it without being racist. To actually go out and preach this, I don't know. I would bring it up with family and friends, and it might spread like that..
2006-11-23 23:41:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nick T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh yes, Mahatma Ganhdy and Martin Luther King are prime examples.
2006-11-25 12:56:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by robert m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If i understood your question correctly......it is truely a tricky question. If non whites practice this theory....it is viewed as cultural purity(to enhance the culture of that race)......what seems odd to me is that if anglos use that theory ......they are labeled as racists.......my hope is that someone with more knowledge in this area will expand upon it.
2006-11-23 19:05:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by cowboycloser2000 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
just thinking that way is racist> if you have to protect your race from another race you are implying things about that race therefore your statement itself is racist>
2006-11-23 06:21:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by rich j 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
people are already doing this!!! i guess it depends on how obsessed you are about keeping the 'bloodline' going? there are millions of mixed marriages and relationships, of course it's possible!
2006-11-23 06:05:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by leolady0765 4
·
0⤊
0⤋