Anybody who watched that trial and thought that OJ was innocent must have had their head up their butts. When Nicole's body was found, the cops didn't know who she was or that OJ was her ex-husband and by then OJ was a washed up has been and not some big star. Why would the cops run around planting evidence just because he was OJ or he was black. They didn't know that at the time they discovered Nicole and Ron's bodies.
2006-11-23 04:55:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Debra D 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
OJ is a man who was thoroughly investigated, was tried in a court of law that was presided over by a fair judge and had the evidence evaluated by a jury who found him innocent of murder. He has always maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand.
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times a publisher controlls the general content and even the title of a book which an author must agree to if he needs the contract.
2006-11-25 13:42:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by sunshine25 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
MAYBE!!!!! he did do it, but its not like he's the only person in American history that has ever gotten away.. There were wayyyy worse crimes that people have gotten off, with no jail time. And if you really looked at the legal system, which I am a part off.. you would be an idiot to suggest that he got off just because he was black?? Thats crazy considering, historically a black man killing a white man has produce harsher sentences. There were black man killed in the past for just looking at white men and woman in he wrong fashion.. There was not public outrage then. No National attention, when a few years ago a white man in Jasper dragged a black man on the back of his pick up truck. Or when a couple white teens killed a Asian man for walking with a white girl, Or just in the last week when a Mexican was kill for apparently being Mexican in the wrong place. Stop turning this into black white, considering most black Americans, consider OJ a F--- sellout,, that only likes white girls, and OJ was accepted by the white community more greatly than the black community before the muderes. The white poilce and judges are to blame for letting OJ go when he was abusing Nicole all those years.. The White media are the ones still filming OJ and keeping him in the spotlight. And some white people are still to blind to see that-- OJ got the usual, legal Star Treatment that most celebrates and wealthy people get.. Thats the problem, not race,, the justice system is more unequal based off class not race. Martha Stewart got a minimum sentence, R kelly hasn't been to jail... if you have money its easier to manipulate the system thru legal loopholes, unless you are messing with the money- like Enron. Stop looking for excuses to hate black people even more. This is a mostly white legal system and government, That killed so many blacks by death penelty in Texas... but less than one percent of lychings were punished... and KKK memebers accused of hate crime are let off the hook?, look at the FBI's conteprolo program, or look at punishments on different crimes for different races, you will see the truth.
2006-11-23 06:00:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by king 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think the man had a fair trial that proved his innocence and should be left alone. Only God and the person knows who did it. Probably will never find out who murdered them....look at the amount of unsolved crimes existing ...theirs was just in the spotlight. The anger held out by the family of the victims is not necessary because in the end the guility will suffer the consequences of his/her actions. Think that the book should have stayed on the market...look at all the money that was made before. Why did America need to see that trial on television? It happened and is constantly happening....if you must blame someone ....let it be the MEDIA....that is what they do ...stir up issues... I say drop the whole thing and let GOD deal with it because hate and retiliation doesn't solve anything. Why does the issue of race always enter into situations? Why is America so set on race? There are too many ethnic backgrounds in America to constantly go back and forth with such.....looking at previous comments, America needs to change its viewpoint ....
2006-11-23 06:33:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
OJ Simpson is a despicable sub-human who murdered the mother of his children and Ron Goldman and got away with it thanks to a very poor judge. Ito had no control over the court proceedings and Simpson's crooked "dream team" was in fact a nightmare! Simpson should be in the express lane of death row instead of parading himself as an aged womanizer lapping up attention wherever he can get it. My sympathies are all with his children and the families of the murder victims. OJ will have to stand before God one day and then he will discover he's run out of "get out of jail free" cards.
2006-11-23 04:39:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by missingora 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
i like it. at the same time as My son became 9 months previous, my husband located oj with pulp indoors the bottle(pass parent) and at the same time as my son might desire to now no longer get something out of the bottle, he threw it against the wall. To on the present time, does in comparison to juice with pulp.
2016-12-10 14:25:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I honestly believe he did, and he's have been convicted if the LA County District Attorney's Office had done their jobs.
2006-11-23 04:31:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
He did it. and if he was a white man who murdered two black people hed be sitting on deathrow right now but because theres a double standard in this country he got away with it.
2006-11-23 04:33:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
missingora said it best...
2006-11-25 10:43:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by spike missing debra m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋