2006-11-23 03:37:01 · 5 answers · asked by sammy j 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You didn't site any examples.
I suspect you support the Dixie Chicks' right to say all the trash they said BUT object to anyone who uses their freedom of speech to protest & refuse to buy their albums & refuse to listen to stations that play their music.
Freedom of speech goes both ways, fella!
2006-11-23 07:55:49 · answer #1 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not when it gives comfort and solace to the enemies in wartime. That comes under another heading.. Used to be called treason. Somewhere along the line, that word has become meaningless.
Need to read historical documents.. does not say free speech.. is states the freedom to speak. It is the liberal Supreme Court which has bastardized the meaning. It is a part of those documents only because under British rule there were not the liberties to have such speech. If there were more than 3 people together, they were questioned. Any meetings of groups had to be done in secret..Read it and weep.
2006-11-24 08:37:47 · answer #2 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe it is seeing examples of written speech such as yours that turn them off from the idea that all thoughts are as important as any others.
Try a little harder to create a coherent thought and everyone will take you more seriously. The spell check on Yahoo Answers works wonders.
2006-11-23 11:47:17 · answer #3 · answered by jpbofohio 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
??? Why can't people on this forum ask questions without insulting everyone with epitaphs and slurs?
2006-11-23 12:00:28 · answer #4 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
FEAR
the fear people smarter than them
they fear people dumber than them
they fear people who are right
they fear facing themselves
but what they fear most is being ACCOUNTABLE to those they should be serving.....
2006-11-23 11:42:05 · answer #5 · answered by mikhail_oza 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋