2006-11-23 03:19:42 · 7 answers · asked by darestobelieve 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Both
2006-11-23 03:21:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There truly is no real answer, as Bright said, it is all about perception.
To a mouse, we are huge, but to an elephant, we are tiny.
But, if you are asking about from our perspective, the universe is immense. It stretches farther than we can imagine.
The only true question that is to be asked is whether the universe has a wall, or if it has no end.
2006-11-23 11:48:08 · answer #2 · answered by g0ren1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All things considered, I think the most accurate thing you could say is "we're near the middle". Our physical size is about 10 to a couple of decades smaller than the known universe, which is about the same scale as the smallest known subatomic particle are to us.
2006-11-23 11:57:38 · answer #3 · answered by Gary H 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we must read and understand relativity theory to find our answer, anyway may be we are tiny and small in our bodies but our brains give us the chance to dominate some how this universe,, as you can see a small tiny lady can be a pilot for huge plane or some tiny ppl can construct huge bridges or towers,, its the brain matter
2006-11-23 13:00:12 · answer #4 · answered by source_of_love_69 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man is incapable of determining the mass of the universe. We could be the size of the dust mite biting on the leg of a dusk mite that is invisible to our own naked eye.
2006-11-23 11:28:18 · answer #5 · answered by demilspencer@yahoo.com 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Both....and according to string theory, much of it is smaller than possible....somehow!
2006-11-23 12:29:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really depends on our perception.
2006-11-23 11:21:37 · answer #7 · answered by Bright 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋