globalization is not helping to poor?

Question

globalization is not helping to poor , i need some case study or some examples,(particularly when america patented our indian trees it was affected the poor people due to globalization)

Answer 1

Globalization was never intended to help the poor. In fact, it's intent is the exact opposite.

You have to understand that to the rich of the world, people are seen as a self-renewing commodity, nothing more.

If company A can get the same amount of work from people in country XYZ for half the price they do from the people in country DEF then they will use the people in country XYZ until it becomes more profitable for them to move their operation to country HIJ. They could care less about the impact such moves have the people they leave without jobs and what will happen as a result.

Never make the mistake of thinking the rich and influential care about the common person. I assure you they do not.

And don't think when you see some celebrity getting media attention over one of their "pet projects" that they care either. If they truly cared they wouldn't trumpet their works for all the world to say, "Oh, what a wonderful gesture to the poor!" Don't kid yourself - it's also a tax write off.

Answer 2

True, it has not helped the poor. But the fact is it is not aimed solely at helping the poor directly. The poor should get emancipated as the overall progress benefits more and more people in the process. In the course of globalization, exploitation of the less well-off countries is to be expected but it is to stop that kind of negative effects that we have negotiations at international levels such as WTO. I can go on but this being a vast subject cannot be discussed at length here.