2006-11-23 01:45:27 · 10 answers · asked by Elliot G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Best President since John F. Kennedy. He gave us the best economy we've ever had and brought us respect in the world. So what he got a quickie? At least he lied about something inconsequential. Too bad he couldn't prevent 9/11 - at least he tried though. Overall excellent President.
2006-11-23 02:43:49 · answer #1 · answered by stk1990 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I voted Republican for Bush, but I voted Democrat for Clinton. You're right, Clinton was not a bad President. (Bill, not Hillary) I supported a lot of his policies, including Operation Desert Fox in 1998. I did not support NAFTA, because I live along the US-Mexico border and saw all the jobs that were planning on (and did) move across the border when NAFTA was approved. As far as uniting NATO against a dictator (I'm assuming you mean Saddam Hussein), NATO hasn't been United against anything in decades. Making resolutions without consequence is not a united stance, allowing the continual and flagrant violations of resolutions for eleven years is not a united stance. Its kind of like telling you not to drive over the speed limit, but if you do, there are no consequences. I don't hate President Bill Clinton, and as far as Presidents go, he done an alright job. Question back to you would be what would President Clinton have done had the WTC been razed by terrorists on his watch? My guess is very similar to what the US done under the current administration, no President can allow an attack on US soil and not launch a military offensive.
2016-03-29 06:41:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a radical leftie I feel Clinton was an awful president, if only for 3 things: NAFTA, Telecommunications Act, and welfare reform.
2006-11-24 17:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad, terribly bad. He was a corrupt piece of lying, cheating garbage that could have prevented 9/11.
2006-11-23 01:56:07 · answer #4 · answered by Chicken Jones 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if you saw "The Clinton Chronicles", a video expose ignored by all major media, could you fully understand just what a conniving lying crapheap of corruption he really was. (video still available, Google it)
2006-11-23 02:22:26 · answer #5 · answered by Gunny T 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I personally do not think he did a very good job, as he committed perjury. He also cheated on Hilary-any man who would do that would have to be gutter slime.
2006-11-23 01:54:43 · answer #6 · answered by Zeorus 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was bad... Maybe not as bad as GWBush - but still bad, for all that...!!! No integrity - just a self-serving Power Junkie...!!! Like they all are... Tony BLiar too...!!!
Show me a leader who NEVER lies to the people...!!! The minute a President or Prime Minister is shown to have lied - about ANYTHING...!!! - THROW HIM OUT...!!!
2006-11-23 01:49:14 · answer #7 · answered by TruthHurts 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
if the worse thing he did was receive a b l o w j o b by a woman other than his wife...... i would say that he did wonderful things for America such as a prosperous economy, a huge surplus, and a rise middle and lower class!!!!!
2006-11-23 01:56:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was good, when he lied nobody died. Also, he didn't tick off the world and have every nation hating us.
2006-11-23 01:54:15 · answer #9 · answered by F T 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
good because he tried to equalize the classes and more equal opportunity for minorities. national budget was in surplus, etc.
2006-11-23 01:48:38 · answer #10 · answered by JaSam 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋