How can I prove the opinion that "The global warming is exaggerated."?

Question

I will have a debate, and our opinion is the global warming is exaggerated, how can prove that?

I will have a debate, and our opinion is the global warming is exaggerated, how can prove that? Although i really cannot agree with this topic, but i have no choice. This is a very important debate, I will be marked, I think i am really bad luck, i am in the affirmative team! "-_-"

Answer 1

In actual debating contests, you don't get to pick which side you defend, you just do the best to defend your case, guys. I think the usual answer is to compare with natural cycles of temperature that are not human-caused. Argue that we're preventing an ice-age which is overdue. You can argue an increase in CO2 would be beneficial to plants/crops, and an increase in temperature would be beneficial to agriculture in the USA. So effectively, you can argue either that it is exaggerated, or that the drawbacks of global warming are exaggerated... not sure I'd try to argue both simultaneously.

Answer 2

Well, if you have to prove the opinion, look at long term weather trends, There have always been variations and trends in the weather.

And the ice age went away long before the use of fossil fuels. But because we know that it is not exaggerated, we must remember that glaciers are melting much faster then ever before and the polar ice caps are getting smaller.

So you can use the above arguements, but the actual trend is global warming.

Good luck

Answer 3

Sorry, you can't because it isn't ... and the answer to the second part of your question is just that you don't understand the science, or you wouldn't have asked.

Glaciers are melting faster than they ever have before in recorded time. None of us knows exactly what the results will be.
The atmosphere will definitely change.

Global warming is caused by us ... we are polluting the planet and we can stop it... or may be we can't even stop fighting each other long enough to save our Home. Dumb huh?

Jonnie

Answer 4

i think of its trustworthy to declare that contributors of the two facets motel to call calling and lies. the diverse stuff that the skeptics right here say approximately Al Gore is staggering. although I dislike the guy, discrediting the entire AGW concept based on the certainty he's a hypocrite isn't something i could settle for. the two facets produce info- which the different area ( the vast majority of) refuse to think approximately not to point settle for. i for my area could be classed as a " believer" , yet I make an effort to envision all the anti-AGW theories and links published right here. i'm a scientist ( Physics , Warwick college) and that i be attentive to that usually issues that we expect to be spectacular, are proved incorrect. yet that's to not say they consistently would be. So careful interest ought to be payed. your assessment of something so ordinary ,which includes ohms regulation ( which 10 300 and sixty 5 days olds are waiting to appreciate and use) , with Climatology isn't conceivable. there is not any debate over Ohms regulation simply by fact it is so for sure spectacular ( in our physique of reference). yet as people we won't be able to see so for sure the entire climate of the planet. greater complicated approaches are required, that maximum people heavily isn't waiting to persist with or understand. Thats is likewise why it relatively is not conceivable to tell you next years temperature. we are in a position to besides the undeniable fact that be conscious alterations in types and traits, the favourite chemical consequences of gear etc, and from that archives generate a in all probability hypothesis. For now thats the main suitable which could be performed. that's by no skill ordinary to "close up" skeptics no rely what share info you have. There are actual people who nonetheless have confidence the international is flat, not simply by fact they're stupid, yet simply by fact they're unable to confirm the planet from area. yet they're going to proceed to be vocal skeptics until they see a image from area. in this variety, people will proceed to be skeptical of AGW until a " photograph from area" equivalent could be got here across.

Answer 5

you know what happens to a screw when you place a screw-driver on its head and twist several times right??
sounds like you are going to!

i guess you could make yourself look like a real big idiot and claim it isn't getting warmer.
but then again, if someone on the other side, really understand global warming, they'll chew you to shreds. hope it isn't for a grade.

Answer 6

lol face it big brother oil doesn't care we are killing our planet at your debate tell them that if we put solar panels on every telephone pole across the country or rooftop we could save ourselves alot of trouble just poped in my head " solar panels"

Answer 7

Your an idiot if you think its exaggerated. Wake up, we are killing our world.