English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

Uh, duude, we're not "attacking" Iraq - we conquered their armies 3½ years ago. What's been going on for the past 2½ years is that we've been helping the democratically elected Iraqi government protect their people and train their troops and establish their new government.

Thanks for noticing!

Oh, and the reasons we went there:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html

2006-11-22 05:28:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

North Korea is not really a big threat because it is surrounded by Russia China South Korea and Japan all of which are super powers. North Korea can't do anything wrong because all this countries can always crush them. Iraq and Iran on other hand is in a very unstable region with people drawn to terrorism my Muslim radical ideology. North Korea wants nuclear weapons for defense...Iran for attacking which is worse?

2006-11-22 15:27:40 · answer #2 · answered by Tiko 3 · 0 0

The USA is not attacking Iraq, right now the USA is trying to find a way to get out of Iraq. The sectarian killings are being done by the Iraqis themselves. Why don't they wise up and get together, show the USA that Iraq can govern themselves, then after the US leaves, they start again on hell bent killing each other.

2006-11-22 13:27:56 · answer #3 · answered by me_worry? 4 · 2 1

Korea is not stupid. They would last exactly 10 minutes if they attacked anyone. I should knew I was there, I have seen the history. THEY AIN'T STUPID. They just want attention. Weird way to get attention right, well no one is saying that the leaders of North Korea where smart.

2006-11-22 13:26:59 · answer #4 · answered by haywardn32 2 · 1 0

The reasons are :
1, NK is a poor country without OIL ,
2, NK is not a threat to Israel
3, NK has in deed WMDs, which scares the **** out of our coward Prez.
4, Attacking NK doesnt serve any purpose to USA, financially or politically .
5, The Chinese in vicinity , NK is a death trap for USA.
6, The Jewish Lobby wouldnt support the Invasion of a "Neutral" country.

2006-11-22 14:24:02 · answer #5 · answered by Cosmaurice 1 · 0 1

North Korea is basically a state of China politically speaking. Besides, nobody wants to pay to restore North Korea where millions eat grass and tree bark.

2006-11-22 13:47:46 · answer #6 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0 0

Any history buff knows that the Koreans, North and South, are dug in and well defended. Also, add in the jungle as a factor, and the probability goes up!! The casualty rate will be much higher if we invade them. And any geologist can tell you that we stay in Iraq because there's "Oil in them there sand dunes!!!"

2006-11-22 13:42:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I guess you want us to launch a nuclear attack on North Korea now?

2006-11-22 13:26:55 · answer #8 · answered by flip103158 4 · 1 0

By that logic we should also attack Russia, France, Great Britain, India, Pakistan, Israel, Canada, Germany, China, etc.

Remember this is the war against Islamic fundy terrorists, not just people who pose a threat. The center if the Islamic fundy terror world is in Iraq. I'm glad that it isn't Kentucky or we'd have war on our own soil.

2006-11-22 13:28:39 · answer #9 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0 2

I think this question should have been answered by the President, Carl Rove, Donald Rumsfeld, or Condy Rice about 4 years ago.

2006-11-22 13:30:35 · answer #10 · answered by hawkthree 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers