English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

advantages and disadvantages please

2006-11-22 04:51:23 · 20 answers · asked by jessica_elizabeth_brown 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting Other - Pregnancy & Parenting

20 answers

nobody should BUY babies

2006-11-22 05:02:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I have good and bad thoughts on this topic.
If you buy babies, then people will continue making babies like a business and children will be more and more in foster care because it would be like a stay at home business and more than likely these children will come from drugged up unhealthy people.
But I guess the good thing is that babies will be hopefully put more in nice homes instead of trashy foster homes or adopted by families who will just use them for slaves. When you actually pay it might show that you will take care of them... or they will be bought by an abuser if buying a child is THAT easy! I definitly think the people who can pay should get them faster than the families with problems with their finances and want a child.

2006-11-22 05:22:20 · answer #2 · answered by Elizabeth H 2 · 0 0

Well it really depends in what sense you mean this. Do you mean buying as in from a thrid world country like Madonna? Or do you adoption? I really see no problem with buying a child. The only situation in which I do believe their might be a problem is where women rent their womb for the fertilization and gestation of a baby. During the nine month period before birth, according to various studies, the "rented mother" usually, by usually I mean 98% percent of cases, developes a very strong attatchment to the child. So that might be a problem. Other than that why not?

2006-11-22 05:05:42 · answer #3 · answered by juniorm915 2 · 0 0

People should have to go through the same process to adopt a baby, it shouldn't matter if they are rich or poor. Just because someone has alot of money doesn't mean that they are more fit to be parents. The same screening process should be involved to make sure that the babies are going to a good and stable home. Babies shouldn't be for sale to the highest bidder.

2006-11-22 05:13:33 · answer #4 · answered by mistypa12000 2 · 0 0

Advantages: Some one who can afford to give the kid a new life
All needs will be met
Paying for and education will be easy

DisAdvantages: Possible lack of emotional connection
Someone else may miss out on the adoption

2006-11-22 04:55:30 · answer #5 · answered by Laura R 3 · 0 0

surely I disagree in my view its unacceptable in both circumstances once someone reaches a particular age. Its no longer truthful lets evaluate a seventy 5 12 months previous couple get a toddler probability is inspite of the actuality that in the adventure that they are very fortunate they gained't see a lot previous the sixteenth 12 months of the youngster, or perhaps as a make sure is meant in idea to bypass previously the youngster no human being should be deprived of a make sure as so youthful an age. no longer something hostile to adoption for those which could't have children, I actually have a substantial situation with the ethics of disparity in age. and really truly get disenchanted with fashion designer children. immorally unacceptable no remember what the circumstances.

2016-11-29 09:12:27 · answer #6 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

RICH PEOPLE? BUY BABIES? No one should be allowed to buy babies so what gives the rich people the right to do so? Babies are Human Beings and buying Human Beings is wrong. You can't just go to a supermarket/shop to buy a baby now can you? If you wanted a brother or sister you can't just go and buy one! It's sick and wrong! Whoever does it is evil!

AND there's a thing called Adption!

2006-11-22 05:02:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

no. they can adopt like every other person. and besides isn't it illegal to BUY a humanbeing i think that adopting is a fine way if you want a kid. adoption agencies have to look into the family. its the best way for the child at hand to be safe. otherwise anybody could own a kid and the kid could be raised in a bad environment. just because someone has alot of money doesn't mean they can skip corners and endanger children.

2006-11-22 05:02:45 · answer #8 · answered by apolloK♫ 4 · 1 0

Either you are referring to adoption, in which the answer is yes, rich people should be allowed to adopt...
or you are referring to some kind of in-vitro fertilization, in which the answer is still yes, they should be able to. What difference does it have whether someone is rich or not? Everyone who wants to be a parent should have that chance.

2006-11-22 04:55:46 · answer #9 · answered by Kayla 4 · 0 0

The majority of poor people who want babies would buy them if they had money.
So why are you picking on the rich people
Having money will not make them any poorer a parent

2006-11-22 04:59:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NOBODY should be allowed to "buy" babies. Of course, if you're adopting, you should have to pay for the court-seeing and what-not, but babies are gifts from heaven. I'd never dream of "buying" one as if it's a slave or toy. That's just terrible. I think that babies are to be cared for and loved, not bought.

2006-11-22 04:54:54 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers