2006-11-22 00:01:01 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
If they are true refugees they wouldn't want to.
2006-11-22 00:02:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There is no holiday status! They all risk that they have no automatic right of return. Some of the answers here are shamefull and forget that refugees are also people and probably have left behind them family, relatives and friends.
There are 9 million children who are refugees in the world, its just too easy to say that its someone elses problem.
Try lving in a foreign country when your not a tourist !!
2006-11-22 09:37:33 · answer #2 · answered by kenjinuk 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Once they leave the country (except for exceptional circumstances, for e.g. appearing as a witness in a trial in a third country) they would lose their refugee status.
They can, of course, as, for example, many Iraqi Kurds or Ethiopians have done, choose to return home permanently.
As previous answers have suggested those who are either asylum seekers or refugees they would be unlikely to want to return to their county of origin as they were fleeing from something in the first place.
This is of course different than a migrant (someone who emigrates legally to this country), who is allowed to travel to pretty much wherever they like if they so wish.
2006-11-22 08:18:30 · answer #3 · answered by Timothy M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if they are able to go back home for a holiday, then they are not refugees and should be deported back to where they came from,too many people use that as an excuse and it is time our government wised up and put a stop to it.
2006-11-23 04:47:48 · answer #4 · answered by mythmagicdragon 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lets define refugee: a person who flees for refuge or safety, esp. to a foreign country, as in time of political upheaval, war, etc.
-a person who has fled from a homeland because of political persecution.
So, why would you want to go home if you are a refugee?
2006-11-22 11:11:43 · answer #5 · answered by DolphinLami 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO
Check your blue travel document (Geneva convention 1951): its is valid for all countries APART for the country of which the refugee is a national.
Anyhow, a refugee is supposed to be persecuted in is country. Apart from having turned masochist since his application for asylum, I don't understand why he would want to go back.
2006-11-23 18:59:43 · answer #6 · answered by Beatrice B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
most of them ain't refugees anyway.i got some living near me and they go back and fourth.to there home country that they fled.but its not the country they said they were fleeing from.that's why before they get to this country.they are told to get rid of all there real paperwork.and the government has said that 70-80 per cent.are not refugees.in the true since of the word.
2006-11-22 08:19:16 · answer #7 · answered by peter o 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Pras Michelle and Lauren Hill have been going on holiday but Wyclef Jean prefers to hang around the doors.
2006-11-22 11:50:20 · answer #8 · answered by Rattler M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No!
If you have indefinite leave to remain from being an asylum seeker (the blue travel document). The Home Office prohibits you to travel to your home country for 10 years. You can go there if you get British citizenship only
2006-11-22 11:53:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they are not. Once your asylum is granted, unless you're status changes by getting British citizenship or marriage visa or so, you will not be able to leave UK. Hence no holiday home, and no holiday anywhere else outside UK.
2006-11-22 12:57:31 · answer #10 · answered by ono 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I'm pretty sure that if the labour government had there way then theyd be able to go on holiday all payed out of child benefits there claiming for children who dont even exist. And then they can claim for mental anguish at being seperated from there ficticious child.
2006-11-22 08:19:56 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋