Understanding is always a positive thing. Understanding can cure diseases, spread love, settle arguments....
I believe in knowledge for the sake of knowledge.
But I agree, the most important question we can answer is not "how" but "why"....
2006-11-21 17:19:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eleventy 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Religion and science both try to explain the universe. However science is the one which seeks the answerer. Logic is a guiding rule for life. You dont drink from cup that has no bottom. You dont sleep in the dirt if you can sleep in a bed. Evolution is just a theory so far its is an attempt to understand what is were part of just like the big bang. "The unexamined life is not worth living"-Socrates
Its like why learn how to read and write? Why learn to do anything? or Did you wanna just stay a single cell in your moms punnanie?
2006-11-21 17:28:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
BTW, logic isn't something learned, logic is something some people have by nature. And scientifically found answers to life naturally fits with logic, for those that are logically wired, as I am. Clearly you are not if you think logic is learned...it's a gift/ability/natural skill...no education can give it to you. You either have a good sense for it or you don't.
And this is where often religion comes in for some people who lack most of the logic gift, because religion is the life answers they were raised with, they know it well, and they don't have the logic to grasp other ideas.
2006-11-21 17:40:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science is about studying the world and the universe. Logic is a fundamental intellectual tool (you have to accept that or reject the Book of Daniel). Are those beheaded in the name of religion happy? We study evolution, because it is the best explation for life on Earth. We know about the big bang because we see the echo of creation.
2006-11-21 18:26:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
As previously stated, your question is nearly incomprehensible, so I'll answer what I think you're asking.
All you really need to figure this out is to ask yourself the same question about religion (I'm guessing that your asking a question like this in this forum means you're religious). After getting past the reasons of salvation and morality, I assume you'd get to the fundamental reason of truth. After all, why would you bet your soul on something you don't consider to be absolute truth?
We're doing the same thing. We don't accept a single, unverified book to be a valid source for this. We look for truth in empirical science. Aside from getting the benefits of vaccines, plastics, and air conditioning, we also unravel the secrets of the world by science.
You get truth your way. We get it ours.
2006-11-22 00:35:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Phil 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Changing Places ,Spaces or even dimension,either Diagonal,Horizontal or otherwise wouldn't have been made any more sense either,tho' Bipedal we are as has always een, on our dreamt we could've been enforced, or facilitated to flies, or do uncertainthing anybody would like to see or hears us we could've been experienced last other nights, previously.
Have of tries to plays on www.888. com and www.777.net
how bussy lives could be fill-out for the 'whatever' to spins on 'somethink' to. Eat yer pill of whatever you could've whatever you might never had to 'experience' phycaly nor mentaly not even on our spiritualy,or vaerbaelie scents.
2006-11-21 17:35:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For because if logic is most wonderful and happy for endevors and future is most bright for reasons because this is the cause of sciences and logics and happiness!
2006-11-21 17:18:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Black Parade Billie 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
computer for what, vaccines for what, antibiotics for what, dyes for what, plastics for what, rubber for what, metal working for what, cereal crops for what, central heating for what, satellite communications for what, electric lighting for what, electric motors for what, sterile operating rooms for what....
The list goes on and on. If the religious had their way then none of the world you take for granted would exist. You would still be living in darkness drinking water polluted by your own feces. you would be dieing of minor diseases before you were 35 years old
For what indeed!
2006-11-21 17:27:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Barabas 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
ask that yourself... i bet you didnt grow your own food... nice one boxer...
2006-11-21 17:32:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by lnfrared Loaf 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think there have been any atheist suicide bombers yet.
2006-11-21 17:31:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
3⤊
0⤋