ok pretend i have a chair right in front of me, i want you to convince me it dose not exist! it can be as long or as short as you want it, and it can be as non-practical, or as scientific as you want!
ok the first person to make me believe this chair dose not exist, wins 10 points!
2006-11-21 13:45:44 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Jokes & Riddles
sorry you really cant see, you should go to a doctor. there is no chair, only computer in front of you now. :D
2006-11-21 13:52:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
By the time you get done reading this, you will absolutely be convinced that your pretend chair does not exist. It won't work if you just skip to the end though.
Ok, so you've got this chair in front of you, right? Right. Well, actually, when I say 'right' I of course mean wrong. Or rather, not right. Or rather, you just said right, but a moment ago you said it was in front of you (rather than to your right). As I haven't observed you turning around, you've already contradicted reality once so far.
You also say that you have a chair right in front of you. To give a direct quote though, you precisely said "i have a chair right in front of me" Of course, when using the letter 'i' as a proper subject pronoun to represent yourself, it must be capitalized. Therefore, by saying 'i have a chair right in front of me' rather than 'I have a chair right in front of me' you are clearly not speaking of yourself, and therefore there is no chair in front of you. Or rather, the chair you have pretendedly placed before this mysterious 'i' is not in front of you in any case.
I am not entirely clear on exactly what a 'chair dose' is. A dose of a chair? Like just a single dose? Is that anyting like a small example of a barstool? (stool sample) I'm not sure how I can hope to convince you one way or the other about a dose of something I'm not certain of. But I can assure you of this: I am not a doctor, and therefore am not legally qualified to write prescriptions, so logically nothing to do with any sort of dose of some exotic chemical called 'chair' would be obtainable by me, pretend or otherwise. So you can forget all about any 'chair dose' in front of anyone.
Your statement that the chair can be as long or as short as I want has little apparent value in proving or disproving its existance. Yet you go out of your way to state it. This leads me to beleive that there could not possibly be a chair in front of you - as you would clearly be able to see or feel just how tall it is, and saying that someone could randomly alter the height (or practicallity) of such an object over the internet is inherently ludicrously impossible.
Finally, I need to get back to studying, as I've wasted enough time on yahoo.answers. But I am sitting in a chair right now, so I am positive they do exist. I can't say if they exist elsewhere beyond the confines of my room though. I have picked extensively on your mis-spellings and poor grammar to make my points, but if you've read through and understand it all then congratulations! You've won a brand new chair! Look down, I beleive you'll find it just in front of you.
Toodles!
2006-11-21 14:38:15 · answer #2 · answered by CSlave 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What test ought to be run? Or what good judgment are we going to persist with to aim the hypothesis chairs exist? ought to we touch the chair with our hands or will seen touch suffice? What if the blind guy won't be in a position to confirm the chair? What if the quadriplegic won't be in a position to experience it together with her arms? Does the chair vanish? Does it not exist? Does your life rely on my senses? we are in a position to brainstorm questions and solutions all 300 and sixty 5 days long and could not arise with an test or attempt which will fulfill every person. And all proposals will although finally end up being subjective. because of this subjectivity the life of chairs isn't a given. With our constrained be attentive to-how we presently hypothesize that chairs exist very like we was attentive to for specific the Earth exchange into flat. Who knows of what we can think of in 500 years?
2016-10-22 12:44:57 · answer #3 · answered by huegel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The chair does not exist as a physical object in itself, rather it participates in the form of the chair. It also may participate in the form of metal or of wood, and in the form of brown, or gray, or whatever its true color. Nothing actually exists but instead participates in forms, the highest and truest being the form of the good which can only be reached by enlightened philosophers.
You can thank Plato's Republic and undergrad collegiate humanities for that answer.
2006-11-21 13:56:48 · answer #4 · answered by Katie S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is the matrix, texture is simply electric impulses sent to the brain convincing you that the chair exists. But, if you convince urself that it dosn't exist, then it wont. USE THE FORCE! im joking lol, get a life!
2006-11-21 13:50:24 · answer #5 · answered by sur2124 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well you just told me to pretend that i have a chair in front of me, so if you look at the area in front of me *there is nothing there*
2006-11-21 13:58:06 · answer #6 · answered by Sarah 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"pretend" chairs(or anything else)do not exist
2006-11-21 14:15:19 · answer #7 · answered by jefchef 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just stop pretending
2006-11-21 13:57:10 · answer #8 · answered by scrubbag 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
imagine taking 3 steps forward
2006-11-21 13:52:40 · answer #9 · answered by sllyjo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
technically, it's a table with a back piece. so, there is no chair in this room.
2006-11-21 13:50:56 · answer #10 · answered by theglockner 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋