sed sine te non valeo means, but without you not to be strong, in latin. i used a translator and the order is messed up. how do i put it correctly into english?
2006-11-21 11:59:51 · 4 answers · asked by mewichigocutie 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Languages
But without you I am not strong.
Valeo is the first person singular present indicative. It could also mean powerful, healthy or even influential.
2006-11-21 13:47:42 · answer #1 · answered by Bentley 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That is the right order in Latin. It means "But without you I don't feel well" or "Without you I don't feel strong." When Romans asked people how they were doing, they would use the verb "valere", which is why both are acceptable. They would start letters "Si tu vales bene est, ego quoque valeo" and when they didn't have the energy or the stationery for that, they would write "STVBEEQV".
2006-11-21 23:47:00 · answer #2 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
contained in the Bible it basically seems as consonants YHWH (otherwise customary with the aid of fact the Tetragrammaton, hyperlink!). that's known that some sects thought the call of God became into too holy to additionally be written out. yet right this is the rub - no one anymore recollects what the vowels are meant to be. this means that the 'Yahweh' shape is only hypothetical. i've got seen others (like 'Jehovah') that connect it to different traditions. So the two the former reason (it wasn't spelled out for a reason) or the latter (no one incredibly knows the thank you to spell it out) is probably why it nevertheless gets excluded.
2016-10-04 05:37:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry i dont know much Latin, but if you want a gruesome one. i read in Lemony Snickets book 5, that, if memory serves
"Memmento Memmori" means
"remember you will die". DONT DO THAT IT TORMENTS YOU. Remember god loves you.
2006-11-21 12:10:02 · answer #4 · answered by NONAME 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋