HUSBAND 1.0 There are a lot of pressures to upgrade from Boyfriend 6.0 to Husband 1.0. However before doing so make sure you understand the implications of this change...
For one, system activity will be severely limited and you will be compelled to instigate rigorous daily routines in space management, garbage disposal and disc cleaning often with an accompanying increase in system administration. This program can also be a drain on many resources and demand constant attention. You will encounter an increased amount of interrupts and error messages, while the program often cancels processes without warning, very often crashing the system. In addition, Husband 1.0 often refuses to respond to your commands and frequently appears to be running processes which you have not authorized. If this happens a lot, do not respond to any interactive requests from the program and severely limit demand for extra bytes.
Every evening there will be a huge surge in demand for megabytes and if not satisfied, the process will become unresponsive and has been known on occasion to damage hardware.
Every so often you will be promised a new release of the program, but unfortunately, upon loading this new release, it is generally found to be almost identical to the old one, with very few feature changes and most of the same old annoying bugs which you were undoubtedly promised would not be there in the new release. Put up with it or discontinue use entirely. Husband 1.0 is a flawed program; many of the bugs are so deeply encoded that, even if they can be located, they are impossible to eradicate and have to be tolerated.
Husband 1.0 will frequently make use of low level language and may not understand higher level commands so you must be prepared to use basic functions when required. Often a few robust algorithms in handshaking mode will produce a good response.
After a while, Husband 1.0 has a tendency to take up more space than originally allocated, often spreading in size and slowing down correspondingly. If this happens, be very careful as there is increased risk of complete system failure. Around this time, Husband 1.0 will also tend to lose bits from the top of the stack, although these will often multiply and be found lower down the stack.
Another problem with this program is that Husband 1.0 can also spawn unknown child processes, which can sometimes inadvertently appear, make huge demands on the program and force unwanted interaction with old versions of 1.nightstand.
Sometimes, Husband 1.0 will end a process prematurely, before you have the required result. This generally results in spawned processes scattered over your system which must be located and removed. More often than not, however, Husband 1.0 will appear to take an inordinately long time to complete a relatively simple process. While waiting for tedious processes to complete you may find it useful to distract yourself by perusing manuals for alternative programs, Stud 2.0 or Lover 6.9
On completion of a process, Husband 1.0 will often inadvertently apply the sleep command, or suspend system activity with a Ctrl ZZ. There is nothing you can do in this case, but leave the program and try again later.
Ultimately, as the program becomes older, it will become more difficult to produce hardcopy, and you will find that most of you work ends up on floppies. In addition, you will be needing software support more often than you'd like. If and when this happens, try to find a copy of Toyboy 1.1. Make sure you have used Ctrl ZZ on Husband 1.0 before loading Toyboy 1.1 and, of course, check for viruses before using any new program. Toyboy 1.1 should come with new hardware which can be plugged into any of your ports.
2006-11-21 11:47:31 · 11 answers · asked by Deranged Insanity 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Jokes & Riddles
Fatal Error, for sure. I believe you'd be better off just retaining current operating system with obvious limitations. Simple to program in BASIC. May require system maintenance. Operate until power cord disconnect. Useful asset. No capital investment required. Maintain current system usage protocols.
2006-11-21 12:07:19 · answer #1 · answered by Joe Schmo from Kokomo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Press Delete
2006-11-21 19:50:16 · answer #2 · answered by The Little White Bull 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like it very much. Sorry, without your permission, I have cut and paste to shared with friends and my wife.
Sorry.
And, thank, it is very interesting and funny.
2006-11-21 20:06:27 · answer #3 · answered by Melvin C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've been updated to single v 8.0
2006-11-21 19:56:03 · answer #4 · answered by Jazz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
omg roflmao
2006-11-21 19:59:40 · answer #5 · answered by Brittney 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You talk too much.
2006-11-21 19:56:08 · answer #6 · answered by David H 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
system restore
2006-11-21 19:53:46 · answer #7 · answered by tfrosts 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is too cute .. and too true. I like it.
2006-11-21 19:52:07 · answer #8 · answered by chr1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stop pasting crap from other sites as your own ideas
2006-11-21 19:49:37 · answer #9 · answered by cedley1969 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
funnier than before!..thx for sharing...:-)
2006-11-21 19:49:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋