2006-11-21 09:18:00 · 26 answers · asked by albert_rossie 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I wouldn't kill anyone. Just because I am dying, doesn't give me the right to do that. Taking justice into your own hands is never right...nto in this country. If you want to live like that, you should move to the Middle East.
2006-11-21 09:21:13 · answer #1 · answered by nottashygirl 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Society? Since when was society something that I was supposed to kill for?
Any terminal illness rampage I engaged on would be designed to encourage individualistic thinking. There is no reason to target major political figures or criminals, since that would simply cause more of the same (whether in rebellion or submission).
And, of course, there would be no death, for that would invalidate my mission. I might put a few people in hospital, but it is the message, not the harm, that will be the focus.
2006-11-21 20:21:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
James Blunt
2006-11-21 09:38:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Allowed" to stay? Allowed via whom? "they won't be able to make contributions something to society so why waste billions of greenbacks"? Are you moreover mght going to off: drug addicts slackers murderers rapists drug sellers corrupt CEOs prostitutes and any of the different low-lifes available who smash the common of existence for first rate human beings because of the fact THEY elect to achieve this? If now not, then you think of you will make a dent in matters via offing the "retarded" (what's your decrease-off?) and the "terminally ill" (what's your definition?)
2016-12-17 14:07:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not kill. Period. All human life is valuable beyond words. If I kill an evil, vile person, I have removed their potential to correct themselves and become contributing members of society.
2006-11-21 09:23:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would kill all chavs, any trampy British chavvy people they call 'famous' and 'celebrities' and George Bush, Ariel Sharon, Rock Hudson (if he wasn't dead!),James Dean (my lucky day!), Ronald Reagan(!) Robbie Williams, WAYNE ROONEY, FRANK LAMPARD, All the people who have ever come on sad shows like Big Brother and all the rubbish!
Half of all women!especially the dumb stupid attention seeking jokes!
There's so much more but I can't remember. I don't think I meant that one about James Dean- I just read his biograpghy and he annoyed me.
Oh I am on a roll. Boy am I mad.
2006-11-21 09:33:30 · answer #6 · answered by The Face 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush Blair
2006-11-21 09:22:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No-one
2006-11-21 10:32:28 · answer #8 · answered by waycyber 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, how could killing anyone be 'for the greater good' such statements are subjective to the opinion of the question raiser.
What represents the 'greater good'? there is no such thing, just as there is no 'lesser evil' they are rationalisations to justify in tolerant actions as suggested by one of your other respondents.
A Christian
2006-11-21 09:44:15 · answer #9 · answered by phil m 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wooooo - too right! I already have a list!
And to h*ll with the good of society, what's wrong with good old straightforward revenge?
2006-11-21 09:22:52 · answer #10 · answered by mcfifi 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋