2006-11-21 04:16:50 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Travel ➔ United Kingdom ➔ Other - United Kingdom
A place is only as bad as the people who live in it.
2006-11-21 08:25:32 · answer #1 · answered by Candy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many bad places, but I would have to say Kensington. Seriously, look at the people and look what they do - these are vacuous morons who fall about themselves day in day out, spending money which isn't theirs and they didn't earn on things they don't need, talking to people they barely know about stuff which wouldn't interest a dead frog. They are awful, and they therefore make the place one hell hole of an attraction. Life and soul is what makes a place good to live in, and Kensington has none.
2006-11-21 04:20:51 · answer #2 · answered by PETER G 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Basildon. Grim new town full of Essex chavs.
Basingstoke. Black hole sucking the will to live from people for miles around.
Manchester. Grim depressing dump.
Slough. Industrial estate with added 'town'.
Chatham. Depressed and depressing - ancestral home of the chav.
Corby. Bit like Beirut but without the sunshine.
Middlesborough. Quite astoundingly ugly.
Blackpool. Windswept treeless wasteland of shoddy B&Bs.
....I wouldn't argue with "all the L's" either!
2006-11-21 09:13:24 · answer #3 · answered by david f 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Driffield, East Yorkshire. My Grandad and Grandma got on a train and came down to London from there in 1910, when they were very young, they married here and very rarely went back, they said it was horrible. My Dad loved London, never went back to Driff, as they called it.
Recently I went to have a look. The countryside is beautiful, but the people are the most mean spirited, bigoted, racist, fat, badly dressed ignorant folk you could wish to meet. Most of them smoke. The food was disgusting.
I will always be grateful to my Grandparents for making us a London family.
2006-11-21 04:24:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People have written books on this kindof thing.
And i wouldn't be suprised if there wasn't a "worst of" tv show!
But really it depends who you are!
If you like shooting people i hear nottingham is good.
If you have lots of money, and get bored easily then I guess it's gotta be London.
Liverpooll for the beatles, and the seaside!
oh no sorry you wanted the worst!
hmm
2006-11-21 04:24:10 · answer #5 · answered by Ontol 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wolverhampton needs to be on this list! The cathedral has been so badly vandalized-even the doors had been set on fire! The museums are closed,and everywhere you go,there's a gang of loudmouthed yobs threatening people and attempting to steal from them! My boyfriend and I shall not be returning after a weekend there!
2006-11-21 04:29:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
England try Wales Scotland Ireland anywhere but England
2006-11-21 04:26:32 · answer #7 · answered by GLYN D 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
newromanticmum should have paid more attention in Wolverhampton - it doesn't even have a cathedral! It's a decent city, but you wouldn't go there for a cultural holiday. More for the footie, beer and pork scratchings! Top stuff.
Worst place is most of London - dirty, crime-ridden, self-obsessed, populated by vicious/vacuous subspecies of humanity.
2006-11-21 04:46:09 · answer #8 · answered by bigoll 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Leeds cos there is so much trouble and most of the people are rough
2006-11-21 04:24:09 · answer #9 · answered by Elle J Morgan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to all the people out there, essex is a great place to live. no one cares whether you look good or not coz some people are too poor to care!!!!!!!!
anywhere that isnt my hometown Stanford-le-Hope for me, i love it here!!!!!!
2006-11-24 04:06:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋