according to our foolproof justice system, OJ is innocent. however, you can certainly purchase his book on how he WOULD HAVE done it.
basically, he's had some time to reflect on his actions; and now he's letting us know..."if i had to do it all over again....this is how i would have done it"
2006-11-21 07:05:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by loveholio 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunate crime but as a person found innocent by a jury he's not barred from writing this theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. Attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand.
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
2006-11-24 20:50:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by sunshine25 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
DNA indicated it was about 6 million to one that he did. However that did not convenience a jury in LA. Such is life in America.
2006-11-21 04:31:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bruster1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah and now he is coming up with a book of (how he wouldve did it)you know if he wouldnt famous he`d done been gone
2006-11-21 05:12:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by spring l 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes together with vodka.....hmmmmmmmm..
2006-11-21 04:19:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Island Girl 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course he did
2006-11-21 04:15:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by riffers21 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
OF COURSE HE DID. BUT WHO GIVES A SH**?
2006-11-21 04:22:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by LIPPS 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
know this is a damb Q.
2006-11-21 04:15:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ok, this is in Food because.......????
Anyway, hell yes he did it!!!!
2006-11-21 04:16:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by GP 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yep!
2006-11-21 08:31:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by maazungo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋