True for both. Israel cannot be off guard
2006-11-21 02:19:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Absolutely true. If the Palestinians lay down their weapons, Israel will bemore than happy to help them economically and socially by creating new businesses, developing an infrastructure, etc. As a result, the entire area will become prosperous.
2006-11-21 06:42:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
false.
As long as both parties do not make the deal on sharing the land they claim, this fight will continue forever in other forms.
In my opinion, simply laying down the weapon is not the real remedy for the current problem. It is like only giving a painkiller to the cancer patient.
2006-11-21 05:44:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by davegesprek 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
specific, it is so deplorable and "extreme" that a settlement is equipped on an empty hilltop that would not displace a unmarried Arab individual in order that Jews can stay there. For the checklist, i detect it a splash disconcerting that settlements are even referred to in a talk approximately definitely combating. yet in spite of if we assumed for argument's sake that that's erroneous for the settlements to be there (a controversy that i don't purchase) in the grand scheme of issues it won't be this variety of undesirable ingredient to do once you get all the way down to it. yet, I definitely have examine lower back and lower back how the settlements are this variety of undesirable ingredient (deplorable on your terminology) and how they even allegedly "humiliate the Palestinians" by utilising their mere presence or maybe seen their mere life termed a sort of "terrorism". Now, getting lower back on your question. All of Israel's strikes are in specific to aim terrorists that ensue to stay in a civilian inhabitants. most of the different area's strikes are in specific used to aim Israeli civilians. in case you difficulty to envision any historic previous of the present conflict you will see that Israel's strikes are in line with diverse strikes that terrorists took with the aid of the years. earlier the 1st intifada in 1988 there exchange into no such ingredient simply by fact the IDF demolishing properties, construction partitions/fences, extensive checkpoints, or significant militia operations in those aspects. Why? simply by fact there exchange into no reason to.
2016-10-22 11:47:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, if only they would. Israel is surrounded by enemies, so they always have to be on gaurd. So true.
2006-11-21 02:16:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
True
True
2006-11-21 02:05:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by C = JD 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
TRUE, TRUE, AND, ONCE AGAIN, TRUE!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-21 02:53:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋