Peter had had "had-had had", whilst John had had "Had-Had had".
"Had-Had" gained the examiners approval whilst "had-had" did not.
(sorry for adding the extra word, but I couldn't make sense of it otherwise. Am I on the right track?)
2006-11-20 23:54:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Peter had Had, whilst John had Hadhad. Hadhad gained the examiner's approval whilst Had had not.
2006-11-21 02:23:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Peter had gained the examiner's approval , whilst John hadn't.
2006-11-20 23:52:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Basil P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Peter hadn't whilst John had gained the examiners and he also had not
2006-11-20 23:47:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Peter had had,had had had whilst john had had,had had. Had had had gained the examiners approval whilst had, had not.
2006-11-20 23:51:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Eric 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Had Peter had, gained the the had examiners had approval? John had, had not had whilst had............
Got f***** had ache now!!
2006-11-21 00:01:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by mysquello 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Peter had "had", whilst John had "had had". "Had had" gained the examiners' approval whilst "had" had not.
2006-11-20 23:52:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
peter had had "had had", whilst john had had, "had had had", had gained the examinewrs approval whilst "had", had not
need the full storey to make sense of it though
2006-11-20 23:52:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Peter had "had", whilst John had "had had". "Had had" gained the examiners' approval whilst "had" had not.
2006-11-20 23:50:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Just sounds like one of those people you meet at supersavers with a speech impediment. You know the ones where you ask where a certain shampoo is and ten mins later they're still stammering and dribbling everywhere?
2006-11-20 23:53:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by mizzsquitz 3
·
2⤊
1⤋