ONE says we all believe in what we see.
OTHER says we all believe in God (we are convinced at some point in life about presence of God)
Which of the two is more justified for a practical and experienceful life
2006-11-20 18:50:44 · 16 answers · asked by Sarab 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Experienceful? What's that?
I think we should do what is best for solving the world's problems, without doing anything we know is wrong. As for God, God may or may not exist, but we have more important things to think about, like getting along with each other.
2006-11-20 18:53:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Belive in god.
A sutiation comes like you are in a road standing for a bus. In a distance, a group of person is standing. Those group want to make a funny things around. So in that one person who cannot speak. You are watching him speaking. But from behind, one of his friend is just saying the words and the person who is not able to speak is just doing some action with the mouth, as if he is speaking. You don;t know them. At that time do you belive them?you can only know it only if you go near to him and talk to him. unless then by seeing, you cannot just say, he speaks. Best is belive in god and your parents.
2006-11-21 14:56:02 · answer #2 · answered by Mayandi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We believe what we see! It's that simple. But keep in mind that even the blind have the ability to "see" things. So I guess it depends on how you are defining the word "see". I "see" God in the world around me. I "see" God working in my life. Just as a blind man/woman can "see" the coin in his hand is a penny, or the curb that is coming up, or danger is near. We really use all of our senses to "see" things.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
2006-11-21 02:59:21 · answer #3 · answered by Mikki 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you know why we belive in god?
Well i think that we don't know how the univesrse is formed and some other questions for which we dont know the answers, so we make it responsibility for god.
I think both can be practical, we can say what we see is god, or we can say that if we dont know where is god, then how can he be real?
2006-11-21 07:05:06 · answer #4 · answered by tammy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are trying to make a dichotomy out of a range of items. I cannot see an atom, yet I believe it is there. And yet I still do not believe in a God.
2006-11-21 02:58:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would largely depend on what kind of experience you're hoping to have.
If you want a worldly experience, then option 1 is good
If you want a spiritual experience. Then option 2 is good.
2006-11-21 02:55:46 · answer #6 · answered by Odindmar 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
experience is the best teacher and reality is always less misleading than imagination in spooks and deities. Work on the grammatical thing .
Peace out and may your life remain real.
2006-11-21 02:59:27 · answer #7 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definetely second one is great
he has seen the things which could not be seen by first
first one is the subset of second
first one's life is predectable what he will do in his life and where he can reach
but second one's things are unseen can not be seen by other.
my personnel experience says that everything is run by the God we are the executers he is the planner, creator, protector and desroyer
2006-11-21 02:57:53 · answer #8 · answered by KrishanRam(Jitendra k) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you only believe in what you see, you will not believe my existance as you never see me. will you?
is it true that i do not exist? there are many many things you can not be practical in your life.
2006-11-21 03:01:08 · answer #9 · answered by naw m 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People who believe in God aren't convinced of anything -- that's why it is called 'BLIND FAITH".
I believe in what is QUANTIFIABLE. I can quantify and measure things I can not see. Like the speed of light. That exists, even though I can't see it.
2006-11-21 02:55:44 · answer #10 · answered by Flashy Ashley 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋