http://www.answering-christianity.com/predict.htm
2006-11-20 14:26:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by IQ girl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a rather controversial Question that will draw a lot of flack.
Please do understand that all the other Religions you have mentioned are not from the family of the Judeo-Hebraic Messianic Faiths; and hence, do not have any references to any Messiah or Prophet.
Judaism believed in "Prophets" and Messiahs; people who had direct access to God and could speak with Him.
In todays World, if you and I were to say that we've just spoken with God and He has said that we must tell the people something or the other, we'd be whisked away to the Mental Sanatorium and put in a padded cell.
Judaism, however, was a Faith that controlled its Members by having them accept the "Word of God" as given to them by their Religious Leaders. Over the years, this began to fail like any other such thing is doomed to do.
While I shall not sing praises to Jesus Christ [ that's a personal thing and not meant for public consumption], I'd like to say that you can see for yourself that He was a Teacher who even preferred to die for His convictions!
The History of Mohammad is not one that can be taken as comparable. However, he was a need of the day there, which is why he succeeded then.
Neither Mohammad nor Christ are mentioned by name in any of the Scriptures as Prophets. It's an interpretation of the "Signs" that are attributed by their followers to say that they are the True Prophets.
How right or wrong these "interpretations" are are what is causing all this conflict.
Have a nice day.
2006-11-20 13:26:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The final books of the Bible have been written hundreds of years till now the qu'ran. It became into from the Bible that Mohamed have been given a number of his recommendations yet regrettably he made variations to God's inspired Scriptures which won't be able to be precise, exceedingly his recommendations on Ishmael and Jesus. Moslems prefer to assert that the Bible has been replaced yet in actuality while the oldest fragments and chapters of Genesis and Isaiah have been modern-day in Qumran they matched the manuscripts we've, So no variations there. The Bible needless to say states that the Lord Jesus Christ is the son of God, no longer basically a prophet as Islam states. additionally it became into needless to say stated that Isaac became into the guy who God needed Abraham to be arranged to kill no longer Ishmael. The covenant can provide of God went via Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (who's Israel). Ishmael had diverse can provide. The Bible is the situation to discover a majority of those issues and that i individually can propose it. Jesus delivered the message of the gospel of the dominion and salvation.
2016-10-04 04:46:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by lyon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mohamed claimed to be the Comforter who was to come, mentioned by Jesus in the New Testament.
The Comforter was sent by Jesus to Testify about Jesus and to lead all believers into the truth of Jesus.
Mohamed did not testify about Jesus, nor led people to Jesus, so his claim to be the Comforter was obviously false, if not hoax.
2006-11-20 13:30:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by sir henry 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well muslims say all other books except quran are not sacred then how come they believe even if they testify arrival of mohammed. Any how , the idea of mohammed to be last prophed is worst one, because, there was SWAMY VIVEKANANDA, who gave better ideas than mohammed, and he was in 20th century. I regard him a lot more than any phrophet.
2006-11-20 13:23:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
last prophet ..well thats just sIlotted in to try and stop others procliaming gods truths and to make muslims feel superior , its stupid and has no validity there have probaly been many men since then that have had a higher level of connection with God we never hear them because some Muslim or Christain extremeist would just try to kill them and hide their knowledge from the world anyway
2006-11-20 13:18:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by harro_06 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Wew, he is not mentioned in all of the scriptures you mentioned coz the scripture is not Islamic scripture guys!
In Islam, his arrival is mentioned in Taurat (you say it Torah) and Injil (our original Bible). But before they become corrupted
2006-11-20 13:17:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Maybe his camel got lost. And by the time his books had been written so they could be added, they had already published the Bible. It is a reasonable question, and i will check back to see if you get a reasonable answer.
2006-11-20 13:13:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
On his return Jesus will testify this misconception of yours to.
2006-11-20 13:11:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sherzade 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Old Scripture is as useless as new scripture. Both the bible and the quran are false.
2006-11-20 13:16:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋