2006-11-20 10:53:23 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
YI think so. Ho Chi Minh is considered the "father" of his country with the same reverence as Americans view George Washington. Of course there are more differences than similarities between the men but for their respective times and eras they were the spiritual leaders and fathers of their countries. Both are surrounded by as much myth as reality.
2006-11-20 11:43:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I were to compare Ho Chi Minh to anyone in the Revolutionary War, it would be General Green. He pretty much did down south what Ho Chi Minh did in Vietnam. He kept the British running all over the place. And although he never won a battle (Neither did Ho Chi Minh), he depleted British supplies and won the war.
2006-11-20 11:01:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ho Chi Minh was considered the father of North Vietnam, John Kerry and Jane Fonda are his children. They all Stink.
2006-11-22 10:24:47 · answer #3 · answered by fmf3 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
maybe,
america just got done kicking the frechies *** just like ho chi minh, and then they both had to take on the #1 supper power using guerilla tactics.
except washington wasn't a prevelant figure in the french indian wars.
and the reason washington fought was for ecconomic prosperity.
Ho chi Minh fought for the freedom of his people.
but i'd sday all and all the more similar then most things.
2006-11-20 11:02:30 · answer #4 · answered by sapace monkey 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
different than Ho Chi Minh grew to become into given capacity via those forces (u . s .) to overthrow the previous Vietnam government, which Nazi Germany amassed with the downing of France. South Vietnam grew to become into very plenty against Minh, so in a feeling you have a divided u . s . a ., it grew to become right into a civil conflict, not a unified one like the only Washington had which grew to become into strictly colonists vs British, in spite of the undeniable fact that human beings did have a Civil conflict in an prolonged time down the line, Washington grew to become into not alive right this moment.
2016-12-29 06:51:24 · answer #5 · answered by devoss 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
George Washington fought to create a land of free people.
Ho Chi Minh fought to create a dictatorship.
2006-11-20 10:56:52 · answer #6 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You sound like a little kid to ask a question like that.
Ask Bill Clinton. He led marches over in Britain chanting: Ho Chi, Ho Chi, Ho Chi Minh.
Now, do your homework.
2006-11-20 10:58:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No - completely different.
Different type of war, different style of leadership, different tactics.
2006-11-20 10:56:47 · answer #8 · answered by jonmorritt 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋