English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's kinda beating a dead horse at this point dont ya think? Hughes was DOMINATED by GSP. He not only knocked out his tooth (yes it was his tooth, who doesnt take a fake out out before a fight) but he didnt even know if he was kicked or punched a few times. GSP brought the fight to his door the entire time. Hughes's *** was done after the first round but he was saved by the bell. GSP just finished what he had started in the second.

The "nut" shot has already been de-bunked even by hughes himself in the post fight interviews. They were thigh kicks that most of us are used to seeing! Plus, who doesn't fight without a cup... if its a full on blow thats one thing, but grazing nut shot? Please. The UFC protected Hughes and his belt LONG ENOUGH. I am glad that the real champ was finally givin the shot to show the world. He is gonna be there for a long time, and I can't wait to see Matt serra cry.

2006-11-20 10:46:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Martial Arts

LOL giving it a thumbs down is fine, but being brave enough to explain why you gave it a thumbs down is cooler. It's kinda like slapping someone and running away really fast.

2006-11-20 11:04:27 · update #1

I gave you a thumbs up Coop. While you sometimes make my brain scream and eyes bleed. I agree with you on the fight. The tooth thing... sorry man. Too many people have said that K-9 came right out. Why would you wear a fake tooth while you fight? MAKES NO SENSE!!! you could choke on it! or have it come out and effect the fight. I say BS to that buddy.

2006-11-20 11:08:24 · update #2

If he doesn't wear it during the fight, why did we all see it fly out of his mouth? LOL its on the video! did you watch the fight?

2006-11-20 11:09:17 · update #3

7 answers

That "nut shot" bs is dumb. Hughes got kicked in the groin, in his rematch against Frank Trigg and finished Trigg off with another rear naked choke. If Hughes was going to win against GSP, he would have. Low blows have nothing to do with his loss. He took the time he needed to recover. End of story.

The fact is, St.Pierre came prepared for the fight and had no intimidation of Hughes, this time around. He's a superior striker, he's faster and more athletic, and he's got an impressive ground game as well (despite not having to use it). Hughes lost the fight because he was kept on his feet, engaged in a striking battle, that was one sided.

Hughes has improved his striking ability a great deal but he'll never compare to GSP's striking ability. For Hughes to win a rematch, he'll have to close the distance between him self and GSP. He have to get him to the ground. He'll have to learn to shoot when GSP goes for high kicks because that's when he's vulnerable. Matt Hughes has to either submit him or "ground and pound him". There's no way in hell Hughes is going to knock out GSP, standing up.

2006-11-21 19:04:14 · answer #1 · answered by PAIN23 3 · 2 0

Nut shot? What a joke. The only people who are actually making this retarded comment are the Hughes fans who can't accept that GSP beat him thoroughly. Hughes even admitted that he thought he was hit by a punch and didn't even realize he had been kicked. If that doesn't speak volumes about the condition he was in after this fight, I don't know what does.

I guess Hughes' fans are just like him. They can shoot off their mouths but when they are made to look stupid, they have to look for a reason to explain why he lost. Bottom line... he lost because GSP is just that much better. Get over it!

So much for Canadians not being fighters eh?

2006-11-20 15:24:57 · answer #2 · answered by alo 3 · 2 0

Hood,

GSP did not knock Matt's tooth out....lol
Hughes wears a denture! That tooth was gone long before Saturday night.

Hood, No offense but he does'nt wear it during the fight! Thats how i know it was out long before Saturday. Plus, I have heard him ask for it after fights, he doesnt want to appear toothless on TV I'm sure.

That being said we do agree on this matter. The " nut" shots were not intentional and are just part of the game. Especially when kicking for the inner thigh. I am happy for GSP he is an exceptional athlete and desreves the belt.

2006-11-20 11:05:23 · answer #3 · answered by wml752000 3 · 1 0

The controversy lies within the minds of the two fighters, most of the time. In a controversial match, the beaten fighter will usually challenge the decision of the bout, expressing his belief that he had actually won the fight. If the fighter is able to admit that he has been completely defeated without question, then there is not a controversy with the two competitors, and the other fighter was decisevly the winner of the contest. Matt Hughes admitted defeat, and like the other guy said, groin shots are part of the game. George St. Pierre is your new champion, and he is legit. My question to everyone else is this. WHO CAN STOP HIM?

2006-11-20 14:18:26 · answer #4 · answered by Sir 3 · 1 0

Alo sounds like she's canadian.......p-ssy!

I'm a huge Matt Hughes fan and all I'm gonna say is long live the future of the UFC. G-S-P!

He thoroughly gave Hughes a legit beat down.

Take it any way you want it but Hughes is/was the most dominant champ in the UFC. In time, I think GSP will be just as dominant. Both are great champions and both are great human beings.

2006-11-20 16:42:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I nonetheless type of listened to them even as it befell, yet that replaced into before in 2009. I lost quite a few kinfolk that three hundred and sixty 5 days in genuine existence, and that i have been waiting to flow on more effective than some A7X followers, heavily, there is not something incorrect with remembering someone and being unhappy that they are lengthy gone, besides the undeniable fact that that is something that doesn't continually must be presented up for all time. a minimum of it shouldn't ought to. Even the band replaced into waiting to flow on with their lives, list new albums, excursion, etc, and it replaced right into a personal loss for them. They likely nonetheless discuss it, yet likely not as a lot as followers. MQ- Yea BQ- the first financial disaster- Circus Maximus (No Youtube link) BQ2- ok BQ3- I loved it

2016-11-29 07:55:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

GSP **** UP MATT HUGHES......

2006-11-20 11:07:19 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers