2006-11-20 10:31:01 · 4 answers · asked by Be objective 3 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Car Audio
Did you know most audiophiles prefer tube amps over IC amps?
Did you know the term "audiophile" and the term "car audio" don't really go together?
Did you know, "Never buy 'car audio' speakers. They are hugely marked up and similar if not same can be had for much less." doesn't make any sense as car audio speakers need to be anywhere from 4 ohms down to 1 ohm?
How does one obtain knowledge of the basics of car audio?
Why here http://spkrbox1.spaces.live.com , of course.
2006-11-20 15:05:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any of the above could have the finest sound high quality. it honestly relies upon on what Kpbs the sound replaced into orignally created on. e.g. in case you rip a song from an audio CD, it would want to have the sound high quality you pick contained in the ripping software. it will be in mp3, wma, wav or aac. yet no comments on rm, reason genuine media is assume to compressed and small and they continually have low high quality sound. To me mp3 is the finest, it has solid high quality and life like document length... the most difficulty-loose Kbps price is 128. yet you'll locate larger Kbps information and they have more effective high quality. more effective the time-honored, more effective the document length.
2016-11-29 07:55:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many audiophiles also think green ink makes CDs sound better, and that magical stones can improve the sound of their electronics.
One reviewer at an audio mag concluded that 192k was good enough to be nearly indistinguishable from the original CD source. 320K VBR should be dang near perfect.
2006-11-20 13:45:18 · answer #3 · answered by Wombat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it depends on how the mp3s are ripped from the cd. some mp3s are better than cd quality.
2006-11-20 13:05:33 · answer #4 · answered by bigdaddypmp420 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋