English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He has committed crimes against humanity by killing hundreds of thousands innocent civilians and he will kill even more.

His juvenile arrogance, misplaced revenge and plain old incompetence at a job he was never qualified for cost the lives of many women and children in Iraq.

He should be held accountable for that.

2006-11-20 09:30:13 · 19 answers · asked by childrenofthecorn 4 in Politics & Government Military

Yes, I can spell. I can think too, I also see, hear, smell and feel.

2006-11-20 09:41:31 · update #1

19 answers

The five worst terrorists in the past seventy years include:
Joseph Stalin who massacred 10 million of his countrymen;
Adolph Hitler, who exterminated 6,000,000 Jews;
Idi Amin, who killed 2,000,000 people in Uganda;
George W. Bush, who (so far) has been responsible for the deaths of 655,000 Iraqis and 3,000 U.S. soldiers;
Saddam Hussein, who was sentenced to death for the killing of 148 Iraqi citizens in a small village.
Of these five terrorists, only Hussein was brought to justice.
Stalin died in his sleep. Hitler committed suicide. Amin retired in luxurious exile. Only George W. Bush survives; he should be tried in an international tribunal for high crimes against humanity, and - if convicted - should hang right alongside Hussein. -RKO-

2006-11-20 09:38:04 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 8 5

You are completely wrong on ALL counts. I don't even like Bush that much, but your question is ludicrous.
Here's a newsflash for you because judging by these boards about 40% of Americans do not even understand how their country is run. All they do is go on about Bush this and Bush that.
Bush DOES NOT run America.
Blair DOES NOT run U.K.
It is their "Administrations" that run these countries. Teams of advisors, lawyers, moral and ethical advisors etc
If you really want to "blame" someone then blame them.
I've got news for you as well because NO amount of regime change in the U.S is going to change ANY of the problems in the middle east. It's too little too late. The problems arise from the west's foreign and economic policy over the last 50-60 years. The west has manipulated and lied to thses countries for years, meddling in their affairs etc. Also we have armed and supported Israel in the murder of tens of thousands of Arabs, dead at the sharp end of British and U.S weapons. This goes back MUCH further than 9/11 etc. If you think that getting rid of Bush and Blair is the answer then you are sorely mistaken and extremely blinkered.

2006-11-20 09:48:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 8

If you can bring reasonable evidence to the House, then go right ahead. I must warn you because this will be very difficult since HE HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG.

2006-11-20 12:25:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Bush and Blair have killed far more innocent ppl than Osama Bin Laden has ...... not only are they killing innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan , they are killing there are own .... sending soldiers into an unjustified war !!

Yes he should be held accountable for his crimes !!

2006-11-20 09:46:07 · answer #4 · answered by jizzumonkey 6 · 7 4

i spent three tears in gtmo bay and i think George Bush would only make the place worse if he were incracated there. maybe a deserted island in the south Pacific would be more approtiate

2006-11-20 09:53:48 · answer #5 · answered by roy40372 6 · 7 2

LMAO You really are a Kool-aid drinker, aren't you? How do you feel about the Iraqi's who kill innocent women and children? Palestinians? Or is it just the evil Bush that deserves your loathing?

Do you think our people would be treated as well by the insurgents? Would the insurgents feed our people according to any religious dietary restrictions they may have? Would they feed our people so well that they would GAIN weight while in custody? Would they provide our people with copies of the Bible or Torah if requested?

Try not to let your hatred do all of your thinking. The detainees at Gitmo are treated VERY well. Please do a little research.

2006-11-20 09:38:14 · answer #6 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1 8

The terrorists are to murder anyone non-Muslim and Muslim who do not bow to them in their frenzy to infiltrate all countries. Remember Hitler's rise as the world stayed ignorant?

2006-11-20 10:40:49 · answer #7 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0 5

The death of all of these "innocent" civilians? You mean the ones that are filled in beautiful towns like Flag shouting Death to America while firing AK47's in the air and burning our flag?

The terrorists and the heartwarming acts of the likes of Saddam and Bin Laden and that idiot running Iran are the ones that have caused this war.

You need to get your facts right. Read the paper, watch the news. MTV and The Daily Show are not news outlets.

2006-11-20 09:35:55 · answer #8 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 4 9

He hasn't committed any crimes. None! I think this is a "juvenile question." HE hasn't cost any women and children their lives in Iraq. That would be the "imported insurgents" because people like you don't think we should close the borders and do the job right.

2006-11-20 09:34:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 9

I imagine that the democrats will try very hard to find something they can charge him with. I also doubt they will suceed. The problem here isn't that he is a criminal or that politics will protect him, the problem is that you bloody fools are just being vicious and trying to take out your nasty and vindictive nature on somebody. Grow up and stop trying to drag everybody down to your level.

2006-11-20 09:39:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 8

fedest.com, questions and answers