English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

does this mean that from now on James Bond doesn't have balls?

2006-11-20 08:05:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Games & Recreation Gambling

4 answers

Lol, casino royal sucks dats all i know. daniel sucks.

pierece brosnan is betta

2006-11-20 08:09:30 · answer #1 · answered by Bobba B 1 · 0 0

I thought the chase scene was fanatastic. but james bond without a gadgets and a decent chase scene was a real disapointment. And after the point where he got his balls wacked it was all down hill, very confusing and it looked like it was being rushed to have a ending.
James Bond will still have balls because the bad guy got wacked before he could ruin bond's family jewels.

2006-11-20 21:48:26 · answer #2 · answered by richardchungteckheng 2 · 0 0

I wasn't keen. Without giving away the story with spoilers for those who haven't seen the movie yet, it just wasn't Bond for me...

2006-11-20 22:08:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I dont think it sucks, i won 590 dollars on the slot machines there..............lol...although i lost all of them being greedy

2006-11-20 16:59:26 · answer #4 · answered by Sunny 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers