English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Say it was USA versus China.

What defences would there be against such bombs.
Every bomb used on both sides would destroy hold cities.

So how would it be fought? With what weapons?

2006-11-20 07:04:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

Nuclear bombs would be used. But it is recognised that there is a ceiling to the number of bombs that would destroy the Earth utterly. Countries involved would limit strikes to below this number as part of the new nuclear war doctrine. China and the US have vast territories so some civilians and military would survive- China has less than 500 warheads, while the US only has a few thousand ready for use.

If World War III kicks off the theatre will be global and incalculably vast- there would be low level skirmishes all over the place. Hence infantry would be used and see action all over the globe- they have an ability to avoid destruction tanks and planes cannot.

The world would instantly become a more violent place- so other wars of a conventional kind would erupt, and the US would intervene where strategically helpful.

2006-11-20 09:14:38 · answer #1 · answered by Peter F 5 · 0 0

I think bombs would be a last resort for any nation...so infantry first. For a country to use nukes first risks global contamination. Whats the point in starting a nuclear war when even the "victors" will be poisoned for decades after? No one wants that.

2006-11-20 07:14:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

America has 20,000-plus nuclear weapons in the arsenal. Any strike from the US could simultaneously destroy China, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, North Korea in a single ICBM attack. There would be no one left to fight.

2006-11-20 07:43:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

conflict on Terror is the worldwide conflict III. that's extremely diverse from the final twp super wars yet incredibly that's aworld conflict. when you consider that maximum of international places are dealing with the challege. it's going to be an prolonged conflict with much greater loss of lives spearding worldwide huge and a brilliant sort of dying.

2016-10-04 04:25:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

all weapons will be destroyed in 5 years and it will only consist of fist fights

2006-11-20 07:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It will not be 20 years. It's closer than that.

2006-11-20 07:07:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anthony M 4 · 0 1

I think people would always want to go in and kill everyone else that the bombs didn't kill.

2006-11-20 07:07:28 · answer #7 · answered by Jabberwock 5 · 0 1

prolly nukes and propaganda the only infantry would proly be spec ops

2006-11-20 07:06:04 · answer #8 · answered by Army__Strong 2 · 0 1

WW3 WILL INCLUDE NUKES AND EVERY KIND OF WEAPON THAT CAN BE USED......

MANKIND WILL VIRTUALLY END AS WE KNOW IT..

DISEASE--WATER-FOOD-POLLUTION-RATS-INSECTS- ECT WILL KILLS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF OF PEOPLE.

2006-11-20 07:14:36 · answer #9 · answered by cork 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers