Which is more believable: the scientific process or one man and one woman materializing from the ether and rib (respectively), duking it out with god over a magic apple, and finally going on to people the world with inbreds?
2006-11-20 05:16:50 · 12 answers · asked by mutterhalls 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Occam's razor...the simplest explanation is more likely to be true.
2006-11-20 05:19:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
'me,' the Adam's apple is an enlargened larynx (from my knowledge, for more ask a real biologist, not a preacher...)
The scientific process is of course more believeable, y'know why? Because people have no reason to WANT to believe it. There are many reasons for WANTING to believe in God, but none for wanting to believe in evolution. Evolution is neutral, as is gravity etc. And it is truth.
2006-11-20 05:39:08 · answer #2 · answered by lady_s_hazy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anybody who has taken the time to study evolution knows it's a fact given the sheer weight of evidence supporting it-there is no competing theory or explanation. There are no gaps, missing links or inconsistencies that challenge it so the creationists should stop clutching at straws and deal with the reality.
2006-11-20 05:35:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all, the scientific process does not create human beings nor does it sustain their life. As for the scientific process explaining how human beings came to be and what sustains their life, then yes, it is a sturdy method.
However, true spirituality is the logical conclusions about God. Just as quantum physics requires multiple theories to even make sense, and practical methods to allow it to come to be, spirituality requires multiple theories to hold ground, and a practical daily effort to allow God to come to be in your life.
2006-11-20 05:21:05 · answer #4 · answered by Julian 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'll never have near enough faith to believe I was a spontaneous accident evolving from a single celled alage so I'll have to go with the historically, geographically, archaeologically and scientifically proven fact that God created me.
Where do you suppose the Adam's apple came from?
2006-11-20 05:22:52 · answer #5 · answered by me 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Adam and Eve story makes perfect sense to me. No hang on. On second thought maybe not. Nice story though.
2006-11-20 05:30:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm going with scientific process, evolution by natural selection.
2006-11-20 05:19:18 · answer #7 · answered by Zen Pirate 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Evolution has evidence.
Biblical Creation of Man has only faith.
2006-11-20 10:52:50 · answer #8 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
99% of all species are now extinct on the Earth. We have fossils that show this... Isn't it amazing how many species exist today? There is no way that evolution hasn't happened!!!
2006-11-20 05:19:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I find that evolution has too many unanswered questions. I'll stick with Creationism, thank you.
2006-11-20 05:23:59 · answer #10 · answered by sister steph 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋