English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am a NATO officer, seen the american army at more battlefields than I care to remember ( I am non combatant, medic, peacekeeper ) they never have any strategy, just throwing in a lot of cannon fodder and hardware, they **** the civilians, shoot at negotiators, get badly beaten and leave us to clear the mess when they have left with the tail between the legs. Why are you guys still keeping this ignorant, braindead generals, instead of showing them the exit ? Why do you believe that **** that they would have won, if not that ........ and ...... ? That they actually did win, but only had a tactical retreat ( korea, tactically retreated for 50 years, but coming back ofcourse ) ( shall we just say nothing about Nam ? ) Lately there was a top brass claiming that the third world war with the muslims was inevitable ! Sure, in the states, not in our backyard, they can not even hold their lines in Afghanistan and Iraq. Do this idiots know that Europe and Pakistan have nukes ? EurPak alliance ?

2006-11-20 05:02:14 · 19 answers · asked by paradise islander 2 in Politics & Government Military

19 answers

I don't know whether the U.S. has the best Army in the world. What I do know is there is no Army from any sophisticated Western nation that knows how to fight in an urban/guerrilla enviornment.

2006-11-20 05:07:24 · answer #1 · answered by jackbutler5555 5 · 4 1

The point is that your a non combatant. If this is true, then how do you know anything about strategy or cannon fodder? You shouldn't draw conclusions while sitting in the rear. Why don't you show some backbone and give a little evidence to prove what your trying to say. You just end up looking stupid.

2006-11-20 05:23:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

u . s . of america is bigger then China presently. explanation why is that the armatures communicate approximately numbers. experts communicate approximately logistics. america is the only usa able to undertaking a great scale invasion of yet another usa that would not border it. China has 2.2 million troops, so what, how do they get them to america? they won't be able to. How does China get air superiority over an invasion zone in spite of in the event that they might get the troops there? they won't be able to. comparable with Russia. Russia could fare extra suitable then China presently, yet even then, as quickly as the have been given the troops right here, it may only be a remember of time in the past their sea-traces-of-verbal substitute have been destroyed and those troops run out of components. america on the different hand ought to invade those different international places, even if, presently those international places could be ready to shielding themselves and US positive aspects could be small. As for Vietnam, we weren't chased. Our military did its job based on the barriers positioned on it. It substitute into the yank public and the political side that lost the conflict. the army won each conflict. Your loss of intelligence is exhibiting with that fact. base line, in case you extremely have been talking in a military experience, you would be talking approximately logistics.

2016-11-25 21:20:27 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Dude I have trained with almost all NATO troops and the only ones worht a damn were the British. The rest were miserable bunch of losers and God knows why they were issued rifles (non-toy) and ammunition.

NATO was/is a gigantic joke. Let's see we have a fifty to one kill ratio in Iraq versus the insurgents. Yes we are cannon fodder.

NATO "officer" what a sad tragic joke that term is?. Makes me think of "Chief French Frier" or "Head Cook and Bottle Washer." LOL

2006-11-20 07:14:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Where the hell our you from? Chances are we saved your ungreatfull coutry more than once so why dont you just saythank you and go about your buissnes. We do have the worlds strongest army its been proven time and time again. We may have made some mistakes but we have learned from them and thats made us even stronger. How can you judge any army, when you dont even have the balls to serve your own? ppl like you just sit on the sidelines and cry while brave men fight and die to give you the right to do so. So shut your whiny mouth and man up,Join the Millitary if you have a set you panzy

2006-11-20 05:19:04 · answer #5 · answered by josh h 2 · 4 1

Everyone knows that Britain has the best army(military)in the world and the British are trained to fight in any part of the world and can even fight better than the Americans at Gorilla warfare.

2006-11-21 03:24:11 · answer #6 · answered by HHH 6 · 0 1

Sounds like your nation needs to do some professional development of their officers.

Let me guess you are one of those Europeans who stood by and allowed the genocide in the Balkans to continue? Interested how it only ended _after_ the US got involved.

2006-11-20 05:27:53 · answer #7 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 4 0

Seriously dude; What part of Europe are you from? The part who's a$$ we saved, or the part who's a$$ we kicked? You sound really bitter and/or ungrateful, so it's either one or the other.

2006-11-20 08:29:15 · answer #8 · answered by p_lo25 3 · 1 0

Bud,

Lay off the pipe...You have clouded your mind. or use tinfoil to clear the impurities

Adam: America has NEVER LOST A WAR we have fought in. NAME ONE??? And Vietnam is not it.

2006-11-20 05:08:43 · answer #9 · answered by devilduck74 3 · 6 0

No, The U.S. Marines are the best. Semper Fi

2006-11-20 05:49:07 · answer #10 · answered by Tim 2 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers