video evidence?

Question

is it time we had video evidence in football ,ref's are making to many mistakes ie ..penaltys and red cards

Answer 1

Too darned right Grumpy. We've just got to admit it they're crap and haven't got a clue what's in front of them.
But then again they're probably eyeing up the latest 'hunk' rather than doing their job!

Answer 2

Yes they should. People say that video replay will take the authority from the ref but I think that the video replay should be there in the event of a dispute (ie: an unfair red card, or a red card incident that neither the ref or linesmen saw - remember Zidane's headbutt?). Of course its use should be regulated and ways can be found to avoid the abuse video replay, but the benefits of having video replay far outweight the downsides.

For instance, the issue of diving can be eradicated with the use of video evidence. Like if incidences of diving can be noted and reviewed, then players found to be diving/play acting by the ref after the review, can be penalised accordingly. Players would then think twice before doing it. Reviews can be done periodically, (ie: a man at the video monitor would radio in to the ref if he sees something suspect and asks the ref to review and call judgement), or the ref himself can decide to review himself if he sees sufficient grounds. In the long run, it won't slow the game down as it will curb diving and unnecessary stoppages due to play acting.

For such a popular sport, it's ridiculous that it's governed by a load of luddites. Video replay will only improve the fairness and quality of football. Enough with foul play and most of all, diving and play acting.

Answer 3

I don't see a problem as long as it doesn't slow down the game. I don't think anyone wants to see regular breaks in play while a panel of experts decide if it was a foul/over the line/etc.

The obvious answer is better training for the refs - I think a lot of them have a problem with the players (whether that is right or wrong is a different discusion) and keep wanting to make examples. Perhaps if the FA cracked down on fouls, diving the players might behave better and the refs wouldn't be so stressed out and making errors!

Answer 4

Definately, the football world needs to catch up!! The 3rd Umpire/ref is being used in all the other major sports ie. rugby and cricket!!
C'mon, get with the programme!! I cant wait, at least there will be less dramatics when a player is challenged.....lets just get on with the game!!!

Answer 5

Yes

Answer 6

yes, for controversial goals (either due to a dispute over offside, going over the goal line etc.) when it goes over but the game carries on the video ref would just tell the main ref 'it crossed the line', and there, goal stands. no stopping and starting of the game. penalty decisions - the match stops anyway with players complaining etc. so no problem there. most decisions (i.e. in the middle of the field) should be left to the ref but if he's clearly got it wrong the video ref should tell him. people say it would ruin the heart and soul of the game, but to be honest, when the ref makes the wrong decision, and you can see it clearly about 5 seconds later, i don't think there's any argument against it. excuses such as 'it makes it more entertaining' and 'that's life' are absolute crap. a lot of decisions hinge bigger things than just that game such as the club getting in to europe, the club getting relegated etc. apparently platini wants to become head of UEFA and he's vehemently against it. it's a shame for football, i think more premiership managers need to make a stand for it

Answer 7

yes i think they should play the replay on the big screen in grounds and then refs can decide on the result.the other day i was at the celtic v Inveress Ct and i think it was zurawski wastaken down in the box and the penalty was not given.its time for the refs to wise up.

Answer 8

A ref has an almost impossible task with 22 players plus 2 managers and their hoard of monkeys trying to influence decisions by breaking every rule in the book. Football used to be game for gentlemen, now its becoming a game for winners only even it it means blatant cheating. Use the video and stop these poor 'sportsmen' from ruining a good game.

Answer 9

Now that I've grown up I realise what a sick game football has become. I loved the game as a kid but now its all about money, cheating, and violence on the pitch. A step in the right direction would be video evidence. But really, football is nearly past saving.

Answer 10

if we do this then a game will end up lasting for hours and hours. then the players will be able to get into a better position while the ref is looking at the vid, so neither team can get an advantage, i think it would make it boring.

Answer 11

Yes a long time over due, it works in rugby so why not football. These players are getting paid lots of money and basically they are cheating so by the time the ref has calmed the players down post incident the fourth/video ref could have studied the video footage then could tell the ref, I personally think the game supporters deserve it for the better of the game, the viewers need it and the refs need the support and backing from video there are so many games being won or lost because of dodgy or incorrect decisions. THE GAME NEEDS IT