English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

if the purpose of sex is for reproduction then are gays and lesbians against nature cause two men or two women can not reproduce. would like peoples views thanks

2006-11-19 20:50:00 · 26 answers · asked by makemesmile 2 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

ps i don't belive we are animals or came from them so don't belive a good answers is to compair us to them and sex is a beautiful gift for an man and a woman (married) from god

2006-11-19 21:02:14 · update #1

i know its not just for reproduction its also a beautiful expression of love between a husdand and wife

2006-11-19 21:43:07 · update #2

randy w i am married and my hubby is more than happy thank you

2006-11-20 06:38:54 · update #3

26 answers

with that logic, yes.
But then most of what man does is against nature. The home you live in against nature, the way we pollute the world is against nature. Being gay is just one of many ways against nature. But it does not hurt nature the way your car does.

2006-11-19 20:56:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In no way is being gay against nature. If your God was so against gay relationships then why allow them to happen? What kind of person woul make someone one way and then punish them for being who thjey are? This is one of the reasons i don't like religion (or believe in it), the small minded and hypocritical views that it spreads.

Being gay and in love with someone of the same sex is just as beautiful as a man and woman being in love, perhaps even more so considering the amount of stuff like this that they have to put up with.

And as for gay sex being unnatural because they can't reproduce, since when has sex just been about reproduction? Sex is the most beautiful and intimate thing that two people who are in love with each other can do to express their feelings and two gay lovers have just as much right to do this as a straight couple.

What is this small minded c**p about it being against nature? Just let them get on with their lives and try to open your mind a bit more.

2006-11-20 08:07:19 · answer #2 · answered by DarkAngel 2 · 0 0

Of course the main purpose of sex is reproduction. But there is evidence of Homosexuality in animals which is puts a big spanner in the works for those who think its just human deviancy. I think the problem we have had is since the sixties that we have had an increase in STDs and of course AIDS this due to a new found freedom and so multiple partners anything goes culture. The only answer has been rubber (condoms) i hope now things are changing with marriage and so more talk about long term commitment.

2006-11-20 05:17:16 · answer #3 · answered by jack lewis 6 · 0 0

Why would it be against nature? Just because it doesn't follow natures rules, well guess what its not following the bibles rules either.....besides, how is it doing nature any harm? Aren't there enough heterosexual people in the world to make babies? I'm sure theres enough, besides its supposed to be a free country isn't it. Oh and even though the purpose of sex is for reproduction then why do so many people use sex as a purpose for enjoyment?? Ur not telling me u and ur husband ONLY have sex to make babies? Sheesh

2006-11-20 16:32:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I can see that you dont believe we came from animals, so i am assuming you believe that god made us.
If this is the case then the answer I would give to your question is that god has made gay people the way they are, since they cant help being gay then it must be natural for them to be so.
The real answer -what I believe- is that it is a common genetic flaw, scientific research has shown that in the womb, an embryo, at 6 weeks, recieves a flood of either male or female hormones which determine what sex it is when its born. Science says that when a male is given female hormones by mistake or vice versa, the person ends up gay.

2006-11-20 05:59:07 · answer #5 · answered by Catwhiskers 5 · 0 0

Who says the purpose for sex is just for reproduction?. Sex is just sex, where as making love is different, there are feeling and emotions involved. Gays and lesbians are not against nature at all, just because they cannot reproduce. What about the poor people that cannot have children, does that make them against nature?. I would say def not!..there ya go, my opinion. :)
Blessings
Soli

2006-11-20 08:37:24 · answer #6 · answered by Solista 3 · 0 0

Try not to think like the butcher @ your ghetto deli: people are more than slabs of beef.

Sex is NOT JUST for reproduction. Its a good way to reproduce, but in no way is that its ONLY purpose.

Its a way to express to WHOEVER that you love them; that you could be with them forever. Or its simply done just to "get off" w/ a friend inside you. LoL

Don't be an idiot. Its "against nature" to deny yourself of what you are undeniably attracted to, ESPECIALLY LOVE!!

2006-11-20 04:58:49 · answer #7 · answered by DelectibleD 3 · 0 0

Nothing can be against nature as it would not exist. Is killing someone against Nature? Perhaps, but the aggressive instinct in man is natural.
As for sex being for reproduction, whoever told you that?
If true, we would be over-populated and the makers of condoms would be out of business.

2006-11-20 08:26:54 · answer #8 · answered by simon2blues 4 · 0 0

search the internet, you will find out all species of animals have gay animals and there was a musem display to dedicate to it.

If you believe in what you wrote, (You would also go to the reproduction website and post couples of the opposite sex should not have sex, if one was sterile and could not reproduce)

Please think of all angle of statements before posting them!

Being gay is just not about sex, its about attraction and Love

2006-11-20 08:12:50 · answer #9 · answered by southernboy 4 · 0 0

I've never understood why people who claim to have moral values and religious beliefs say that homosexuality is 'against nature.'

The same people would presumably watch the birds and animals getting it on, and they wouldn't dream of putting them out of their misery.

If there are homosexual people in the world, and there has been ever since time began, it must be totally OF nature, and not AGAINST it.

I just love people who tell me I am 'against nature,' when I've never had much choice in the matter.

Don't religious folk do sex?

Find me a believer who claims never to have masturbated, and I'll show you a liar.

I'm not aware that this in activity which leads to procreation, and it must therefore be 'against nature" just the same as homosexuality.

Grow up!

2006-11-20 06:54:30 · answer #10 · answered by musonic 4 · 1 0

Against nature? Lots of things are "against nature" yet still exist on this planet. Homosexuality is not only found in the human race, it is found in other species as well. And I do believe for gays and lesbians...it IS natural! So what I'm saying here is, who are we to judge what is and isn't against nature? Let's let God (or your God-thing-person-God) decide and let it be.

2006-11-20 04:57:22 · answer #11 · answered by Barbara W 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers