English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Will this deter GW BUsh from a war with them?

11/19/06 "AFP"-- -- WASHINGTON - A classified draft CIA assessment has found no firm evidence of a secret drive by Iran to develop nuclear weapons, as alleged by the White House, a top US investigative reporter said on Saturday.

Seymour Hersh, writing in an article for the November 27 issue of the magazine The New Yorker released in advance, reported on whether the administration of Republican President George W. Bush was more, or less, inclined to attack Iran after Democrats won control of Congress last week.

A month before the November 7 legislative elections, Hersh wrote, Vice President Dick Cheney attended a national-security discussion that touched on the impact of Democratic victory in both chambers on Iran policy................

2006-11-19 20:44:33 · 8 answers · asked by paulisfree2004 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

8 answers

Iran has no weapons of mass destruction but it has oil. It might suffer the same fate as Iraq.

2006-11-19 21:00:33 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 0

If I were the Iranian leadership, knowing what I know about how America interferes with Iran's domestic politics ( remember, in 1954, the CIA fomented a coup that led to installling the Shah )
I would see the US as an enemy and a threat and certainly would refuse to cooperate with American demands. Somehow I am NOT surprised that the CIA, in its peer review process of analysis would not find anything...Iran is probably not developing them.
We do know how lies are the pretext to any major acts in the Bush Administration. All they seem to know is how to start wars we can't win.

2006-11-19 22:23:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

We are most likely setting up propoganda as a pretext for war with them in case we do. The same way Iraq was setup to be developing WMD. It's probably a lie. Iranians might not being developing anything. It's sad to say but our governments and media words are nothing anymore, and cannot be trusted.

2006-11-19 20:56:32 · answer #3 · answered by digdugs 3 · 2 0

I must commend you on asking questions like this it just brightens up my day. You are about as bright as night and as sharp as a bowling ball. First of all this is a magazine aimed at doing what oh yeah selling magazines at all costs yes at all costs. May be you should listen to what there dictator president has said. for that matter I am all for not going to war and bringing the troops home, but this S.O.B. in Iran is antaganizing the U.S. he is leading us with a carrot on a stick. I see it now he wants us to attack thats the problem. So to answer your question no. Oh and what is this i saw on c-span about a democrat talking about the draft. SCARY!!!!!!!!!!

2006-11-19 21:12:48 · answer #4 · answered by Logical Leroy 2 · 0 3

The presently disclosed CIA intelligence rewards Iran for preventing their gorilla warfare adverse to the yank occupation of Iraq, and cools the point of the chilly warfare between Iran and the U. S.. an similar intelligence replaced into withheld in 2003 to create warfare hysteria adverse to Iran, with the intention to make conceivable a protection force attack adverse to them and to intimidate Iran by creating them trust shall we attack them. Barring such an attack, Bush II can attempt to rigidity Iran into backing off of Iraq. The CIA releases the intelligence which will help the plans of Bush II. it isn't an open democratic employer. For warfare adverse to Saddam in Iraq it lied with claims of WMD. For the tried attack adverse to Iran (which now might want to be on carry) it lied about the state of Iranian guns progression. Bush i replaced into head of the CIA, or perhaps as he replaced into there crafted a plan for protection force domination of the area, progression underground bunkers contained in the desert of Saudi Arabia that we nonetheless occupy. even as he grew to grow to be President, Bush i began to have interaction his plan by goading Saddam to attack Kuwait by telling him by diplomatic “decrease back channels” the U. S. does not merchandise if he might want to take over Kuwait (an historic province of Iraq). once Saddam invaded of route, Bush I unleashed warfare plans that allowed the U. S. to proceed to be contained in the area with protection force forces. As a democracy we received't trust the CIA to grant us honest information. The elite view in authorities is that public opinion in a democracy must be managed and manipulated. worry of WMD looks their prominent approach. in truth, Iran is coming up WMD. One ought to question, besides the undeniable fact that, how a lot of that is a self-pleasant procedure as because of the Iran attempting to guard itself adverse to the bullying of the Bush dynasty.

2016-11-29 07:26:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

ok they dont have nuclear weapons obviously or else they would have used it by now.

They're enriching uranium which THEN can be used to produce a nuclear bomb. The Iranian government has already openly told us that they are enriching it and plan on making one.

2006-11-19 20:46:53 · answer #6 · answered by Jac R 3 · 0 1

Welcome to the big lie. It is never ending. Maybe bush wants to take Iran too and it all can be called HalliBushCo Oil.

2006-11-19 20:55:19 · answer #7 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1 0

Wow New Yorker Mag.

We geez that makes me feel better.

lol

2006-11-19 20:49:58 · answer #8 · answered by Jon H 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers