The Kinsey Reports of 1948 and 1953 stated 37% of males and 13% of females had homosexual experiences, but this includes incidental homosexual experience. The study reported 10% of males being more or less exclusively homosexual and 2% to 6% of females being more or less exclusively homosexual.
A 1990 study (Homosexuality/Heterosexuality by McWhirter, Sanders, and Reinisch) stated 13.95% of males and 4.25% of females had "extensive" or "more than incidental" homosexual experience.
A 1993 study (The Janus Report on Sexual Behavior) found 9% of men and 5% of women were involved in frequent or ongoing homosexual experiences, but only 4% of men and 2% of women called themselves homosexual. This difference can be attributed as those who were 'out' and those who were 'closeted'.
It appears that the number of male homosexuals is approximately 10% and the number of female homosexuals is approximately 4%. It also appears that only half of those who are truly homosexual are "out".
2006-11-20 02:13:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by χριστοφορος ▽ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The whole reason that you're getting 8 billion different answers is because it all depends on how you define what makes someone "gay" or "bi" for the purposes of the survey.
Do you need to have sex with someone of your own gender to be gay?
What if you just haven't gotten around to it yet, but you're planning on it?
What if you completely think gay people are revolting, but for some weird reason you can't stop staring at that sexy guy across the hall. Are you gay then?
Just how many "gay" thoughts does it take until a person turns "gay"? Is it only one? Five? Ten? Fifty?
I guess I'm just trying to point out that people tend to get really caught up on number things like this, where everyone is forced into one box or the other. The truth is, there is no bright line demarcating where "straight" stops and "gay" begins. This incessant need to force a label upon everyone only serves to obscure the real truth, which is never that black-or-white.
2006-11-19 22:14:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by foxwallow 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's difficult to say as so many homosexuals don't readily disclose their orientation. In Seattle, a pretty homosexual-friendly city, I've heard the population is 10%-12% gay. In San Francisco, supposedly 1 in 5 men are homosexual. Hope that helps.
2006-11-19 20:46:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Amy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
this might nicely be a consumer-friendly slant that many positioned into the political section. it extremely is meant that in case you're a Republican, you hate minorities, do no longer choose for to help the needy, and are at ultimate, a card-donning Klansman There was a term that has when you consider that been very easily phased out SOUTHERN DEMOCRAT the necessities for being a southern Democrat substitute into in certainty to have been Democrat with the aid of kinfolk traces (aristocracy), and ordinarily a member of the Klan or sympathetic to the 'reason'. i'm no longer talking related to the Klan on the instant. The Klan on the instant has gotten clever and is extra a white version of the NAACP. to no longer say they dont have their circulate burnings and rallies, yet they are extra political now. the real nuts are the Aryan countries. they think of the klan is only too wishy-washy. The Klan i'm talking approximately is torch-bearing, lynch mod Klan. question: What political occasion substitute into George Wallace from? He beneficial weren't Republican, no sir-ee. He ran as Democrat thrice and self reliant as quickly as. plenty for the Democrats being for the 'human beings'. i've got self belief that the Democrats save the standard black american like a mushroom, 'becoming' evil whitey as a fashion to generate votes, and supply the blacks somebody to hate (different than them). agencies like the Rainbow Coalition, and NAACP are becoming to be redundant (even with each little thing, we've a black president and are all meant to be making a music Kumbaya arm in arm now), yet they save digging up evil white adult adult males to lynch. the final element to do is depart a ineffective dogs die. declaring racism each and all of the time motives extra issues than it solves. Isnt it astonishing that when Candaleeza Rice had one on the best slots interior the white abode, she substitute right into a 'lacky' of George Bush? If she could have been a Democrat, they could have been prostrating themselves in the past her. Has everyone heard of Alan Keyes? He ran for president, yet God forbid there is this style of element as a conservative black guy. I certainly have heard bill Cosby saying some surprisingly profound words of know-how, and am taking off to think of he could be a extra conceivable candidate for president in assessment to the present one. a minimum of he could make blacks and whites snicker.
2016-11-25 20:54:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
20% or 2 in 10.
2006-11-19 20:43:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Deutscher Eishockey Bund 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
15-20%
not including bisexuals
2006-11-19 20:45:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chris C 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 snaps, a twist, and a fabulously super approximation of 30-40%
We're Here!! We're Queer!! You're Gay and so is The Whole Country!!
2006-11-19 20:48:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would say 8 out of 10 people are either gay, bisexual, or sexually confused.
2006-11-19 20:53:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
and admit it?...about 10 percent....but I don't think that all the married men that hit on me are being honest on the forms.
2006-11-19 20:45:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are a number of polls on this but I would say under 5%
2006-11-19 20:44:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jon H 5
·
0⤊
1⤋