English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

USC blah blah blah..I just read a guy's post and he said the only reason USC beat Arkansas was cuz Araksans' star quarterback and running back didn't play much. are people who say things like this just plain dim-witted or do they just hate USC no matter what? maybe them so called stars should've played defense too?!?! since Arkansas gave up 50 points to a USC team that was playing 15 true freshmen.

i mean i can definitely understand the hating from fans of SEC and other conferences but can they at least act like normal human beings? there's difference between intelligent haters that can talk some respectable smack and plain, embarassing retards that talk outta their azz.

why do they think they know so much? Shouldn't they be ranking teams since they so damn smart?

2006-11-19 19:24:20 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

5 answers

why brotha, u smack daddy, u

go SC!

2006-11-19 19:34:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Since you seem to drink a lot of garnet and gold Kool-Aid, why don't you get a job as an SID assistant there or something and leave everyone else the heck alone? I know USC stomped Arkansas, but if USC were in the SEC, BIG 10, BIG 12, they'd get killed week in and week out! ONE GAME against Arkansas doesn't speak about how USC might fare against the REST OF THE LEAGUE. Nor does it mean anything about how they might fare against the Big 10 playing UM, MSU, OSU and etc. Or the Big 12 with OU, UT, TTU, T A & M, and etc. So stop reading about how badly you beat Arkansas and think about how you and several other schools are getting screwed in this crappy BCS setup and why we need a playoff of some sort that won't have everyone so down in the mouth.

2006-11-21 04:25:35 · answer #2 · answered by bigvol662004 6 · 0 0

Well it is the truth, but I still believe the Trojans would have won that game regardless. You're going to get bias opinions no matter what. Im a Notre Dame fan and I'll always have some akward explination of why Notre Dame is better than USC, although it could be entirely untrue. I enjoy reading into what people have to say about the different confrences, but I dont buy into much of it since it all is settled on the turf.

Too many people let their football bias seep into their general football knowledge, and thats why you see a lot of crap like that.

Who knows, maybe USC and Arkansas will meet in a BCS bowl in January.

2006-11-19 19:38:01 · answer #3 · answered by Snolan860 3 · 0 0

I saw that post and answered it with this: In a sense, USC was playing its backup QB/RB combo, as it was the first game they had played after losing Leinart, Bush, and White, and somehow they managed to win by 36.

Solace for the Trojans will be the fact that if they beat Notre Dame and UCLA, they will be in the title game, no matter what anyone else does, which will be their fourth in a row.

2006-11-20 00:17:44 · answer #4 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0 0

i hope USC kicks ND butt this weekend, i'm a buckeye fan, i would like to see OSU and USC in AZ

2006-11-20 00:32:19 · answer #5 · answered by megsum9500 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers