Let's face it, whether he did or not get a proper trial would the verdict be any different? Can anyone tell me on here that Saddam Hussein does not deserve whatever he get's for his crimes against the Kurds alone, not forgeting his own people? Why should Human Rights Watch, waste their time.
2006-11-19 17:54:56 · 12 answers · asked by Dumbledore 3 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
These "do gooders"should concentrate on more important matters rather than waste their time with evil monsters such as Saddam Hussein.
This Tyrant did not give the poor innocent people he murdered a fair trial and,even at his own trial he continued to interfere with Justice and had members of his defence team killed because he thought they were not doing their job properly.
This is back to the same old question,who is more important the person who commits the crime or,the victims,in the eyes of these Human Rights people Saddam is important.
He should be hung at the first opportunity and get it over and done with.
2006-11-19 19:29:17 · answer #1 · answered by mentor 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it's vital that they bother AND that people act upon the observations. Not to do so will result in more local outrage, violence, killing and tyranny.
This is the perfect example where it is so important for justice to not only be done, but also SEEN to be done so that peace can break out by showing Iraqis and the international community that law and order in Iraq can be trusted to get things right by giving defendants a fair trial/hearing regardless of who they are or with what they're charged.
The Iraqi infrastructure is too fragile to suffer a self-inflicted blow. Ordinary people need to see that they can have confidence in 'the system'.
The report by Human Rights Watch, if acted upon by the authorities, will help Iraq achieve their goals for internal peace that little bit quicker.
2006-11-19 18:23:22 · answer #2 · answered by ♥Robin♥ (Scot,UK) 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
His trial had became right into a Kangaroo court docket with all the interuptions and murders for the duration of it. you ought to bear in mind that there is a distinction between a court docket verdict and his definitely guilt. exchange into there any doubt that he dedicated the crimes he exchange into accused of? No. Did the government have adequate info to link him? i don't be attentive to. i haven't been following the trial heavily adequate. Do i think of any of this concerns? No. could I be unhappy if, after analyzing the trial transcript, I got here to the tip the prosecution by no skill did instruct his guilt previous a useful doubt (or in spite of time-honored of info this court docket needed)? No. Am I happy he's off this earth. You guess.
2016-10-22 09:54:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As an Ethnic Assyrian, and Christian from Iraq, i say hang him in the streets. He murdered and ethnically cleansed thousands of Assyrians over the last 35 years, committed wholesale genocide against Kurds, and Arab Shia, persecuted the Turcoman, Yezidi, Mandean and Armenian minorities. He was an Arab nationalist and racist who banned people speaking their own languages and tried to arabiscise the entire population etc. Anyway, his trial IS fair, certainly by the standards of the middle east.
2006-11-19 23:48:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Unforntally yes, human rights is about giving anyone a fair trial, way to life etc. It doesn't matter how evil the person is, his human rights should still be granded otherwise we are just as evil as him.
2006-11-19 18:10:44 · answer #5 · answered by Mr Hex Vision 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think that the combined efforts of Tony and George W have killed far more Iraqi civilians than Sadaam. The invasion was illegal, which makes the trial illegal. I tend to think that he was the only chance for a semblance of law and order in such a divided land, and he was also the main western defence against fundamentalism. The lunacy of Bush's Goebbels-like fantasies of allying him to Al Quaida could not have been worse tactically, because in Gulf War Mark 2 the fool got rid of one of Al Quaida's enemies for them without them needing to send so much as one suicide bomber in anger. As for human rights, they should start with the worst criminal of all and his war on terror, before they start looking at minnows like Sadaam.
2006-11-20 02:44:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Every men is equal before God. It is not the matter of Human Rights. It is the fact that each human being must must know.
He is human like you and me. Do you have a formular for undoing our sins? Only God knows. He deserves all the rght to live. Only God will judge him.
2006-11-19 19:27:47 · answer #7 · answered by mbuso n 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Saddam Hussein Human Rights
2017-03-01 08:36:35 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well i agree, they should use the time on real problems in the world not on a dictator who killed innocent people.
2006-11-20 00:33:22 · answer #9 · answered by Confused 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Human rights, whats that bollox all about then.
Today i shall be mostly wearing Khaki and acting like bloke..
2006-11-20 01:42:13 · answer #10 · answered by Georgie's Girl 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋