USC hasn't lost a home game since the 2001 season when it was Pete Carrolls first season as there coach. USC has won 32 straight home games best in nation at home. and just to put them huge numbers aside for a second USC has enough motivation hering everyone say there not the team they was and michigan is better. but the main thing is them numbers lol.
2006-11-19 17:28:27 · 8 answers · asked by Justin L 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Plus, USC under Pete Carroll had NEVER lost a game in November!
2006-11-19 17:43:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That wcbasebal guy who said a bunch of garbage is a plain hater that thinks with disfunctional brain cells.
USC is a weak team in a weak conference?!!!?! How many damn so called top conference teams USC has to demolish for retards to start talk straight?????????!?!!
Guys from SEC and other conferences are gonna hate on USC no matter how good the program is. USC has 11 national championships second only to Notre Dame's 13 or something since 1901. Yes they are so weak that blue chip players around the nation can't wait to sign with them every year since Pete Carroll took over. Is it USC's fault that they are in PAC-10??!?!
Hell Naw.
They have just lost 2 freaking games in 3 years by a total of 5 points and now people are hating??!?!
Retards who make garbage up ought to get lined up and ****.
Maybe the wcbasebal guy should be a sports writer or be on ESPN college game day since he knows so much about football.
Stupid bitchh.
2006-11-20 03:08:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
wcbaseball4 is full of it. He's doing what everyone else does - looking at 1 or 2 games vs. the entire season. His argument about USC's win over Arkansas is bogus, as that was the first game for the Trojans after losing Leinart, Bush, and White, and somehow they still managed to win by 36.
And Nebraska's not a good team? They'll end up 9-3, winning the Big XII North, and playing for a BCS bowl bid. They're a lot better than Southeast Missouri State, Louisiana-Monroe, and Utah State are, who comprise the remainder of Arkansas's non-conference schedule.
2006-11-20 08:22:29 · answer #3 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here is the numbers....USC should have absolutely NO CHANCE at playing for the natl title b/c:
They lost to a bad Oregon St. team. 7-4, thats Oregon St. record. Their other 6 wins came against teams w/ a combined 25-42 record.
USC spanked Arkansas...ok...to bad Arkansas starting QB didnt take but 6 snaps, McFadden, their top RB, only played 3-4 series due to an injury as well.
USC beat Nebraska, who has proven to be not all that good. Nebraska is not a tough team.
USC has just 1 solid W, and that was a depleted Arkansas. Cal is not tough (Tennessee proved that by DOMINATING them, and they lost to friggin Ariz.), Oregon isnt very tough, the Pac-10 as a whole is maybe the 4th best conf. in college football. No defense. Cal who again is weak, proved that the Pac-10 sucks by being a great great offensive machine in the Pac-10, but when playing anyone worth a crap (USC, Tenn) they were easily shut down.
USC is a good team ill give them that, but they dont deserve a bid. Even if they run the table.
Florida deserves it, beating LSU, Tenn., and Arkansas (if they win). Thats 3 very very solid teams. USC will have beaten just 2 if they run the table (Ark. and ND). Florida's only loss is to a very good 10-2 Auburn team, not a crappy 7-4 Oregon St. team....
If Arkansas runs the table they deserve it by beating Florida, Tenn., LSU, and Auburn...
Basically it should be either one of the SEC champs...USC is product of a weak weak conference....weak....
2006-11-20 01:41:18 · answer #4 · answered by wcbaseball4 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Naw Notre Dame will slaughter them!
2006-11-20 01:37:47 · answer #5 · answered by JUAN FRAN$$$ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, they are both over rated this year....still should be a good game.
2006-11-20 08:07:30 · answer #6 · answered by Batman has left the building 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't count your chickens before they hatch.
2006-11-20 02:02:47 · answer #7 · answered by no nickname 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great question?
2006-11-20 01:30:55 · answer #8 · answered by l_c_b307 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋