English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How does the wii's graphics comare to X-Box or PS2?

2006-11-19 16:56:33 · 6 answers · asked by kobebrez 1 in Consumer Electronics Games & Gear

6 answers

here's the order of quality, i work at gamestop and know EVERYTHING! WORSHIP ME!

WORST
Gamecube
Wii
Xbox
Playstation 2
Xbox 360
Playstation 3
BEST

disagree?

checkout the facts:

PS3 has full HD support. neither the Wii or the 360 have anything close to that.

PS3 has blu-ray compatibility. The Wii has nothing of the sort. and the 360 requires you spend $200 to play HD DVDs which arent even as good as blu-ray discs.

Ps3 can store up to 60GB of music movies and games. 360 can store 20GB and Wii can store jack ****.

Ps3 had games like resistance, Lair, Full auto 2, Motorstorm. the only good game of the 360 is halo 3, which wont be here until next november.

PS3 has the option of HDMI, AV, Coaxial, or component output, the 360 gives you one cable that will use either A/V or Component, and they have the nerve to call the component output HD. wii makes you use AV.

The Blu-ray discs used for PS3 games make the games enormous, and worth much more time. i beat gears of war on the 360 in 9 hours. i have been playing resistance for 12 hours and i am about one quarter the way through. the Wii isn't even worth mentioning here, all their games are aimed at children and can be finished with within 4 hours.

there is really no question as to which is better. the only reason you may hear negative things about the PS3 is because people have decided to jump on some PS3 hating bandwagon. they are the same ignorant dipshits that barge into best buy to buy an iPod without considering other players by creative.
"Gotta get an iPod, thats what everyone else has, everyone hates the PS3, i gotta hate it too"
come on, grow up, get your own opinion.

2006-11-19 17:02:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

guy_from_britain is absolutely correct. There is one problem though. The cheap PS3 costs a whoppin 500 bucks! And the premium PS3 that costs 600 bucks has so many benefits that the 100 extra bucks is more than worth it. Same thing goes for the xbox 360. the premium 360 costs 400 bucks.

The PS3's graphics are slightly better than the xbox 360's, and that's if you play it on a large HD TV. Unfortunately, a guy at Best Buy told me that video games are not good for plasmas TVs. The wii's graphics are only a bit worse than the others', but nintendo keeps making kiddie games, so you can't really see the whole potential of that system's graphics.

2006-11-19 17:38:20 · answer #2 · answered by The Riddler 3 · 0 0

The Wii's snap shots are extra suitable then the Gamecube's. you are able to truly see the difference on a interest it extremely is on the two Wii and Gamecube. i could say, maximum video games on Wii certainly look like the PS2's snap shots, yet some Wii titles do exactly no longer stand out that plenty.

2016-11-25 20:45:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Guy... I would agree with you, but I am looking forward in owning system. I can't wait to play Zelda on the Wii when ever I get a hold of it. I can't help it to still love the classics. Wii is nothing compare from PS3 of course. Hopefully someday I will have both. Do you think you can hook me up? :-) I have store credit there.

2006-11-19 17:26:06 · answer #4 · answered by Christina L 1 · 0 0

The Wii's graphics are better than the PS2's and comparable to the Xbox's.

~Scottie

2006-11-19 18:33:04 · answer #5 · answered by Scott T 6 · 0 0

There's something about the Wii that makes it sound small.

2006-11-19 16:57:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers