if you had been on the jury?
2006-11-19 13:27:34 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Yes. I would have.
2006-11-19 13:29:08 · answer #1 · answered by Phyllobates 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I really can't say because I did not get to see all the evidence that the jury actually saw to make its decision. However, with what I do know from watching the trial, I would have to say that I probably would have found him guilty. It is sad, but the jury used the opportunity to make a political statement and not render a just verdict.
2006-11-19 21:31:35 · answer #2 · answered by JZ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off, I dont think a man who is innocent would make a run and create a police chase unless he was guilty.
A man who grieved his wife, and was innocent would be more prone to stay there.
By running he admitted guilt there.
Gloves and shoes and blood.
Just goes to show you that its not about the law but about the lawyers. Defense had better lawyers, there you go.
What goes around. OJ will have to look The Heavenly FATHER and answer to HIM with no excuses when the time comes.
And while OJ is stil on earth, theres the question of the civil lawsuit he lost, which required him to pay large amount in punitive damages.
The boys family started presing the issue recently so it seems like OJ is getting very desperate for his money.
the guilt from what he did will eat his insides out.
And he still gets to look forward to answering for what he did.
So, talk about karma coming around to bite you in the ***
2006-11-19 21:39:34 · answer #3 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Totally. The whole thing was a ridulous pompous show of money and power and theatre. He was guilty, as sure as the sun come ups. What kind of man would write a book and go pose in front of the house where he killed them and wear his gloves etc. etc. etc....no care or concern for the pain he is causing the families now...just concerned on how to make a buck to live off of since he knows his life is and was over the minute he got off scott free. How can anyone even tolerate his presence.
2006-11-19 21:31:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not based on the case I saw on TV
The prosecutor was horrible
The defense team was great
I don't like OJ, I think he played a part in things, but based on what I saw, expecially the DNA evidence, if that was a serious poker game and I had the Cards the DA was holding, I would have folded after the antie!
2006-11-19 21:32:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We were all put on this earth for a reason, to judge one another, or to be judged, is not one of our functions for being on this planet. If O.J. did what we all believe the news told us he did, than yes he is guilty, however, he will be judged by a Higher Power( A.K.A God),come the day of reckoning. So even thought he mite not have spent a day in prison, to burn in the fiery pits of "HELL" will more than make up for any injustice he may or may not have gotten away with here on earth...
2006-11-19 21:56:14 · answer #6 · answered by mario p 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely.
2006-11-19 21:29:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am intelligent enough to have understood the DNA evidence. That means that I would have found him guilty.
2006-11-19 21:29:46 · answer #8 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes,when you run from the police you are guilty of something,because you only run when you have done something wrong & i think the 20 police cars chasing him weren't trying to get his autograph do you
2006-11-19 21:38:10 · answer #9 · answered by Spanky the monkey !!! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How could one not find him guilty, yes I would have.
2006-11-19 21:31:04 · answer #10 · answered by G3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutly. I think the fact that he was presumed innocent is a mockery of our legal system.
2006-11-19 21:29:44 · answer #11 · answered by ←Shea→ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋