2006-11-19 13:09:50 · 11 answers · asked by SANAT 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
she is not in charge. She is the mandarin who holds the strings of UPA puppets.
2006-11-19 18:16:51 · answer #1 · answered by Brahmanda 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO - Maha Bharath was selecting the Ruler from the outsiders (not invaders). On the death of a King, if there is no heir, the new entrant - outsider - would be called to sit the throne.
You are wrong about Maha Bharath. The Bharat were interested to be ruled, not to rule, as ruling was a heavy responsibility to keep the nation happy and peaceful and prosperous and NOT any Bharat (Indian) himself was ready to take up such responsibility. The other is not ruling or administration of a Nation. It has some other meaning, but we all forgot to use that particular word, in the disguise of 'King or Emperor'. It is a responsibility of 'One to everybody and Everybody to one'. Whether South Indian, Kanada, Gujarati or Marati or Bengali, be an Indian. Let us revise, whether Indian, pak or italian, BE AN UNIVERSALIAN.
2006-11-20 05:47:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How is she unethical? Because she is an Italian by birth? She is more ethical than many Indians. Furthermore, if an Indian can become a part of the American government why can't an Italian be a part of the Indian government?
2006-11-19 22:21:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am a patriotic indian so I understand your concerns however, I agree the previous poster. How is she unethical? Some indians try denying there nationality, does she? Is she proud or not to be in charge of India, think of these question, then decide what your real opinion is. You need to consider the opposite point of view then make your final decision!
2006-11-19 22:25:04 · answer #4 · answered by Blarhbhb 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How does it matter who sells and misrule India. Be it Vajpayee or Narsimha Rao or Lalu or anyone else?
Whether or not Indian they are all stooges of US and the like. It is shameful that we have such a ruling class to rule us.
2006-11-19 21:48:00 · answer #5 · answered by navya 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, i think she is an able woman. and then, when people like Lalu, Charan Singh, etc. etc. have not been able to do anythin, i think a foreigner like her shud be given a chance. I jst want India to progress, wether a foreigner or an Indian sits at the top.
2006-11-20 10:39:35 · answer #6 · answered by Koolkris 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is absolutely shameful that even after 60 years of independence we still overvalue foreigners like lady queen of the ruling party.
when u don't have enough talent in u or u r reluctant to search talent the sortcut is to select someone with fair complexion.
her own country though will never give indians any chance to rise to such a high level.
our silly generousity has fetched us many misfortunes in the past and it will continue to do sao in the future if we do not realise that people like this lady have vested intentions in her mind .
she is not the one she pretends to be.
let us unite and protest against it . VANDE MATARAM.JAI HIND(NOT ITALY).
2006-11-19 22:47:41 · answer #7 · answered by ANIRBAN B 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is it not SHAMEFUL that you call your country 'MAHA BHARAT' instead of ' MAHAN BHARAT'
Dont you know MAHA BHARAT was the bloodiest war happened on earth.
Call my country 'MAHAN BHARAT' and learn to write it correctly.
2006-11-21 11:32:57 · answer #8 · answered by ♪¢αpη' ε∂ïß♪ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WHEN THE SONS OF THE SOIL IS SELLING THE COUNTRY TO THE HAND OF WORLD BANK AND USA WHAT WILL YOU SAY ABOUT HER. NOW YOU SEE THE PERSONS SITTING ON THE HIGH POST AND PERSON SITTING IN THE OPPOSITION ARE AGENTS OF THE WORLD BANK.
2006-11-19 22:25:22 · answer #9 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course not. as long she fight,strugle for indian people welfare, and love hindustani land so much, why not.
2006-11-19 21:54:27 · answer #10 · answered by dena 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋