This is a follow-up to this question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmT9RVTOIjVJW6eiYNIFasIezKIX?qid=20061119175512AAMlr3z
2006-11-19 13:04:57 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Yes, choices choices...
I'm sure they have the same personality too, right?
2006-11-19 13:08:16 · answer #1 · answered by -.- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As all things are perceived by a biased observer, the 'inferior copy' would be the first that in some way; by movement, scent, sound, shading, personality, reactions,or whatever, gives the first minute displeasure to the observer. From that point she is flawed, unless the other makes a much more serious faux pas. Understand that the fault is based on the observer's standards and may be endearing to a different observer. Thus the fault is with the observer.
2006-11-19 13:22:32 · answer #2 · answered by Karfain 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Inferior and superior for that matter are mere tools of thought, they don't really exist but help us to some extent to figure out what we're faced with. The two beautiful identical twins on the other hand are a reality altogether and on their own. And way far too complex to simply call inferior or superior. Because comparisons never exceed the reach of their notion and as such never make up for the truth.
Besides if one of them is smarter the other has to have superior idiocy in comparison!
2006-11-19 13:31:37 · answer #3 · answered by groovusy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How do you know thath they're identical? Monozygotic? Are you sure? How can you tell without a DNA sample? Even if you had the DNA sample are you going to look at every one of the 3 000 000 000 base pairs? And when you do what do you think you'll find?
I suspect that be the time you get through with all of that nonsense you will have already found out that we don't know enough about the genome, base pairs or how to properly evaluate a life, let alone be able to make an informed chioce about which is "better".... as per your question......
2006-11-19 14:48:26 · answer #4 · answered by Philosophy Prof. 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No! are all siblings comparable? in case you're actually not the comparable as your brother or sister why could you be the comparable as your cousin (comparable twin mothers and dads or no longer)? infants incorporate a random blend of genetic fabric from each and each parent. because of the fact of this each and all of the youngsters in one kinfolk are distinctive different than the place a embryo splits into 2 or extra interior the womb. Then the genetic suggestion is the comparable and you get comparable twins and so on..
2016-11-25 20:29:48 · answer #5 · answered by behl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither is a copy of the other, so there is no need to decide which is more inferior.
A more helpful metaphor would be this: the sisters are two machines built from two xerox copies of the same blueprint.
2006-11-19 13:26:57 · answer #6 · answered by Monte Leone 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
we choose which one is inferior. There are none because if we choose which one are inferior, then we are always wrong. We will never know for sure because we do not know the true answer. we cannot make judgement on them. Only the twins can do that not us. The twins know the true answer.
2006-11-20 02:29:06 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The better question is: is she the inferior copy, or the new improved version?
2006-11-20 22:21:54 · answer #8 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither is inferior! They are both two separate individuals! -Offended twin.
2006-11-19 13:10:26 · answer #9 · answered by hot brdwy diva 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The one with lesser moral virtues, or vice versa, according to the chooser.....
2006-11-19 14:21:42 · answer #10 · answered by Pink Rose 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋