George Bush has committed war crimes in violation of the UN Charter and the Nuremberg Charter.
Synopsis: Bush attacked Iraq, against the decisions of the United Nations, and thus violated the UN Charter. Planning and committing a war of aggression is a violation of the Nuremberg Charter. According to the US Constitution these international treaties are part of the "supreme Law of the Land". Bush has violated the Nuremberg Charter and the UN Charter and is, therefore, subject to impeachment.
2006-11-19 11:40:33 · 9 answers · asked by jl_jack09 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Iraq had nothing to do with Sept. 11th. they never attacked us. Congress authorized the use of force to remove Sadam. Congress has not authorized the occupation of Iraq. Congress has also not declared war on Iraq.
2006-11-19 12:17:52 · update #1
Back in 1970, Rep. Gerald R. Ford defined impeachable offenses as "whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history." That is probably a reasonable definition, consistent with the intentions of the Founding Fathers.
2006-11-19 12:23:48 · update #2
I have never liked Bush, but rumor has it, when he was governor of Texas, he worked really well with the democrats there. Let's give him a chance.
2006-11-19 11:42:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
What about the sanctions placed on Iraq? How many violations did Saddam have to commit to provoke war? Do we charge all Congressmen and women that voted for war with war crimes too?
2006-11-19 19:53:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
How can you say Bush committed war crimes when all of the U.N is corrupt and broke hundreds of laws
2006-11-19 19:52:12 · answer #3 · answered by spyderman131 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You mean the same UN that used oil for food for profit for themselves?
2006-11-19 19:55:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
In case you forgot. THEY ATTACKED US & WERE THREATENING MORE ATTACKS! I would much prefer that we hit them 1st. President Lincoln said "The Constitution is not a suicide pact". Neither is the UN charter.
2006-11-19 19:47:33 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I generally don't support the letter of the law, but in this case I'll make an exception.
2006-11-19 19:42:31 · answer #6 · answered by Minmi 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Um I might not like Bush ok, but I dont think he can be charged with breaking a law our country doesnt recognize.
2006-11-19 19:42:22 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I HELLBENT was not privy to White House briefings and therefore am unable to make a fair assessment of the situation.
2006-11-19 19:42:50 · answer #8 · answered by HELLBENT 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Dream on LIB!
2006-11-19 19:45:37 · answer #9 · answered by daydoom 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋