2006-11-19 11:08:40 · 14 answers · asked by sparks 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Clinton brought us World Trade Center I (1993) and II (2001)
USS Cole (2000) Khobar Tower bombing (1996) Embassy bombings in Africa (1998). He ignored genocide in Rwanda (thanks to Wesley Clark). He bombed an aspirin factory in Sudan. Speaking of Sudan, he declined to take Mr. bin Laden into custody on several occasions when offered. Sandy Berger, his National Security Advisor found it necessary to stuff top secret documents into his underwear when leaving the National Archives and can't be sure what he took. His balanced budgets came at the hands of Newt Gingrich and the Republican Congress. His unelected co-President wife tried to vacuum up 1/7 of the U.S. economy into a national health care plan using closed door meetings. And then there's the perjury (see I didn't mention sex once)
Bush is cleaning up the mess
2006-11-19 12:46:28 · answer #1 · answered by Bullwinkle Moose 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clinton
2006-11-21 19:13:00 · answer #2 · answered by rajni l 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i did no longer fairly look after bill Clinton as our president yet he did do diverse reliable issues. He did diverse fairly undesirable issues as president additionally yet giving him credit for what he did do or maybe pondering the undesirable issues; he did plenty greater useful than Bush has. yet, Hillary isn't bill. She from time-to-time means that bill would be waiting to help her and that i could wish if she is elected she unearths somebody to help her as i do no longer think of she will safeguard the interest because it desires to be achieved! She has already shown she lacks the fortitude or self perception to stand up and be measured by using her own own values. i think of in all hazard the final she could be waiting to do is to alter history showing her to be the worst president in our history fairly than Bush! OH - and it become extreme high quality to make certain the objective audience on the Las Vegas Democratic debate BOO HER whilst Edwards pronounced her taking contributions from particular interest communities.
2016-12-30 15:39:19 · answer #3 · answered by jerklin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton. He knew that a leader in a democracy has to lead by consensus. He couldn't build one against Bin Laden ebcause half of the country was too incensed over oral sex to pay attention to the Middle East. Bush believes that leaders "do" and followers should follow.
2006-11-19 11:22:46 · answer #4 · answered by Dr_Adam_Bricker 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Clinton did his job regardless of his sexual antics. He didn't get us into wars under faked pretenses and he DID reduce our debt and also reduced red tape in the government.
Bush has done very little for the average American. The debt is higher than it's ever been and we're embroiled in two wars. Although the invasion of Afghanistan was justified, Iraq was not.
2006-11-19 11:49:38 · answer #5 · answered by loryntoo 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I personally believe Clinton was a better president because he knew how to talk in a complete sentence.
2006-11-19 11:11:46 · answer #6 · answered by Just get it over with already!! 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
hahaha its pretty much a fact that clinton was...he basically got rid of our national debt...which isnt evident now that bush is in office...
i believe theres an interview from fox news with clinton...its interesting...they try and nail him for being a bad pres, but he shuts them down...its on youtube somewhere
2006-11-19 11:17:14 · answer #7 · answered by Andrew T 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Clinton, he was well received on the world stage, charismatic and was his own man. Bush has too many "advisors" which probably was his biggest downfall.
2006-11-19 11:17:08 · answer #8 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Actually, looked at from a perspective of my " few " years, neither. Both place saving hacks who will not stand out in history.
2006-11-19 11:42:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush
2006-11-20 17:11:01 · answer #10 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋