The Da Vinci Code?

Question

Did you like it or hate it? I've heard really bad things about it, and I've heard mildly good things about it. What did you think? Personally, I liked it. It was kind of like National Treasure.

Answer 1

I loved it but the book was soooooo much better, for instance one of the main points was that there was a cryptex inside of the first cryptex, in which the password of it was sophie. however, overall it was pretty good. also the girl who played sophie shouldve had red hair and tom hanks shouldnt have been put in that movie. i think that he shouldve been a more athletic actor. but it was kinda like national treasure. both i have watched over 10 times each now. lol

Answer 2

You mean National Treasure was kind of like The Da Vinci Code. National Treasure was made way after the novel came out and was done so only to try to make money off the public reaction to the plot of The Da Vinci Code.

Answer 3

The good news is that Ron Howard is a better director than Dan Brown is an author. The book was more about showing all the stuff Brown has"discovered" than a story...the movie is a story.. Tom Hanks is good no matter what he does and this was no exception. The bad monk was REALLY bad...and the girl was just a girl but French. This book and movie have really improved tourism in the areas mentioned . The startling information is not all that startling...well not to me. It is a slick well done production of a not very well written travelogue...

Answer 4

The Da Vinci Code is nothing but a Theory. It may or may not be true. However, there may be something of significance related to the stars carved at the top of the church ceiling walls... also why would a church have a statue of a girl named Sarah! What is that all about anyway? I know one of the Egyptian religion's was known as "The Star Religion!" You should check out my question related to King David's Son Solomon for more information related to stars. I think there may be some connection.

Answer 5

Da Vinci Code Da Bomb

Answer 6

The movie was a long and glorified trailer. If I had not read the book, I would have not been able to follow the movie. Both were bad. The only reason I gave it any attention is that I knew that friends would want me to go with them to see it.

Answer 7

If you are a hardcore, closed minded conservative god freak, you would hate it, but if you open your mind and dont let the critics get to you, it is a really good book, as well as being very interesting. i am agnostic, and i enjoyed it, but my friend who is a god freak, refuses to read it because of the way the book supposely degraces christian thought. the only parts it really mentions is how christians took pagan ideas and turned it evil (the pentacle, for example) for the good of converting people, and how jesus MAY have been married and have a bloodline. other than that, its a action filled, adventureous tale. i recommend you read it

Answer 8

It was alright I think it could've been better. I don't see why their was so much controversary towards it. It never changed my aspect of what I feel about the Christian Religion. I totally was into the art aspects of it. It makes me want to research the history of most of the artworks. I wouldn't mind going to Paris or Italy to get some knowledge of certain artworks.

Answer 9

It was a very good film but people who have read the book dislike like because the film missed alot out.

I didn't read the book and i enjoyed it !

Answer 10

Yeah it was a pretty good movie, despite of all the people responses. It kept me guessing. Its really all about what you believe. Movies are made for entertainment, people should all keep that in mind.