2006-11-19 10:21:32 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. He would have been in France.Like he was when he was supposed to be patrolling on his swift boat.
2006-11-19 10:28:06 · answer #1 · answered by STIFLE IT LIBS 2 3 · 8⤊ 3⤋
No. John Kerry doesn't have what it takes to be a leader. He has already shown everyone how he feels about war. He is a coward in my opinion. Anyone who returns a medal that was given to them for fighting in a war doesn't deserve to be in charge of anyone. Kerry is not a leader.
2006-11-19 18:29:06 · answer #2 · answered by RIDLEY 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
No, I doubt the military would fight for that cowardly ba$tard who threw the military on the train tracks and ran back and forth over it. I really think Kerry would be very afraid to be near the military. Sort of like Jane Fonda hanging out with US troops. Not a wise decision.
2006-11-19 18:26:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
I do not think he would have done any worst but then again, this war is not going to be won period. It is going to continue. The people in the middle east are born to die. They even teach there minor children to shot just as soon as they can hold a gun. Male children born are more respected than female children because of this.The only purpose a woman has over there is to give birth to more children to kill someone or be killed. It does not matter to them. And that is very sad. So how would anyone deal with people of this mentality?
2006-11-19 18:29:35 · answer #4 · answered by shyone 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
You mean like posing as a war hero as he paddles a boat down the Tigris and Euphrates River?
2006-11-19 18:32:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Kerry would run away screaming like the little sissy boy he is. He isn't smart enough to fight in a war.
2006-11-19 19:06:48 · answer #6 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It does not matter. That will not change anything. It is what it is and we have to deal with it. The war is going exactly as Bush and Co planned it from the beginning. War is good for business.
2006-11-19 19:04:20 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Yes ,because being someone who actually fought in a War ,he would not have fell for all the BS that the Neo-cons fed Bush.
2006-11-19 18:26:35 · answer #8 · answered by Carlos D 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Are you kidding? He would have surrendered to countries we aren't even fighting & then begged their forgivness for the fact that we exist.
2006-11-19 19:06:34 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Judging by his past election campaign, he was extremely hypocritical to what he wanted. Based on that, I honestly don't know. But I don't support Bush either, so honestly, it could go either way.
2006-11-19 18:32:27 · answer #10 · answered by crkadct 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Well since Kerry is not tied to big Oil ...there would not be a war in Iraq.
2006-11-19 18:23:31 · answer #11 · answered by dstr 6 · 3⤊ 9⤋