the late '90s.?
2006-11-19 09:47:44 · 12 answers · asked by why? 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Glad you asked, "WTF' is this question ABOUT?"
Same point as the guy asking if Bush blames Clinton when the White House runs outta TP.
Both question are 'tarded, but mine was posted with an objective.
As for the other guy..................
2006-11-19 23:06:13 · update #1
he's now asking if the Titanic sinking is Clinton's fault.
Come on libbies, stupid is stupid.
One of you tell him to stop being stupid.
2006-11-20 03:28:20 · update #2
Because they were more interested in teletubbys than the economy.
2006-11-19 09:50:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Like most economic issues this had nothing to do with government, this was the markets own fault where foolish investors ( or greedy as the case may be) falsely inflated the value of the dotcom industry and like all good markets that bubble bursting is called a market correction, learn what the hell you're talking about before posting you nimrod
2006-11-19 11:36:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What makes you think we cant?
Why cant conservatives remember Hoover's stock market crash of '29, or Bush's lies about Iraq having nuclear bombs?
"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud." -- George Bush, lieing the nation into war on 10/7/02.
2006-11-19 09:53:58 · answer #3 · answered by Phil S 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I remember the dot.com bust all too well, what is your point that was not a liberal agenda issue. It was the failing of the the business community for buying into the idea of the new economy.
2006-11-19 09:51:24 · answer #4 · answered by cliffpotts2007 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the first casualty war, politics AND activism is TRUTH.
If they do mention the dot-com bust, they'll tell you that it was fine before Dubya was elected, and therefore it is Dubya's fault.
2006-11-19 09:50:58 · answer #5 · answered by geek49203 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I know a lot of Republicans who got rich off the dot.com era before the bust
2006-11-19 11:08:48 · answer #6 · answered by bconehead 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I own 10 .coms, please tell me of the Bust, I remember in 2000 when bush came in and everything slowed down, it wasnt some big bust as you might think, at least not in my businesses
2006-11-19 11:56:30 · answer #7 · answered by Jon J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A drop in the bucket compared to Enron, Abramoff, and Haliburton and the fiasco in Iraq. Look at where we are now compared to how well off we were then. You just can't admit that we now have the biggest deficit in history and owe trillilions to China. Goldwater and Reagan wouldn't recognize this so-called Repub. party and the voters have rejected it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lT7uOjtjoU&mode=related&search=
2006-11-19 09:52:45 · answer #8 · answered by notyou311 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You are pathetic. How are the "libs" responsible for the dot com bubble?
2006-11-19 09:55:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I bet everyone remembers but what's that got to do with libs?
2006-11-19 09:51:04 · answer #10 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋